Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2013, 09:52 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Your tax dollars are subsidizing many cars.
How so? ...certainly not the tune of a $7500 tax credit in addition to whatever they are handing to the manufacturers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2013, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,885 posts, read 10,967,002 times
Reputation: 14180
Sometime about 1910-1920, Henry Ford I said that ALCOHOL would be the fuel of the future. The model T was built to run on pure alcohol!
Thomas Midgely, the man who worked for DELCO (Detroit Engineering Laboratory Company), and developed Tetra-Ethyl Lead as an anti-knock additive for gasoline, Agreed. Midgely also stated in front of a Congressional Committee that Tetra-Ethyl Lead was NOT poisonous or hazardous. It is said that he actually washed his hands in leaded gasoline to prove it! It has also been said that he was suffering from lead poisoning at the time.
google it; it is an interesting read!
Since reading about Midgely and the Ethyl Corporation, I don't believe anything said by the government or anybody else about the fuels to power vehicles!
Battery powered vehicles could easily become as much of an environmental disaster as the gasoline or diesel powered vehicles. Hazardous in different ways, but still hazardous!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 08:41 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
How so? ...certainly not the tune of a $7500 tax credit in addition to whatever they are handing to the manufacturers.
What do you think GM and Chrysler cost you? As an aside though, I agree that the government picking winners here is counter productive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 08:43 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
Sometime about 1910-1920, Henry Ford I said that ALCOHOL would be the fuel of the future. The model T was built to run on pure alcohol!
Thomas Midgely, the man who worked for DELCO (Detroit Engineering Laboratory Company), and developed Tetra-Ethyl Lead as an anti-knock additive for gasoline, Agreed. Midgely also stated in front of a Congressional Committee that Tetra-Ethyl Lead was NOT poisonous or hazardous. It is said that he actually washed his hands in leaded gasoline to prove it! It has also been said that he was suffering from lead poisoning at the time.
google it; it is an interesting read!
Since reading about Midgely and the Ethyl Corporation, I don't believe anything said by the government or anybody else about the fuels to power vehicles!
Battery powered vehicles could easily become as much of an environmental disaster as the gasoline or diesel powered vehicles. Hazardous in different ways, but still hazardous!
I suppose we all should just walk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
Please not both crude oil and natural gas substitute can be made from coal. Just heat it in the presence of water steam. if the heat is provided by a high temperature gas cooled nuclear reactor the system does not need to burn coal to produce the petroleum substitutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,885 posts, read 10,967,002 times
Reputation: 14180
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I suppose we all should just walk.
Well, it WOULD enhance our health, no doubt about it.
We certainly can't go back to horse and buggy days, what would we do with all the horse excrement?
The best answer would be the broadcast power that Tesla was supposedly working on, and supposedly had almost perfected before he died.
Compressed natural gas (CNG) is a viable fuel, with much of the infrastructure already in place (there are natural gas lines all over the country), and all that is required is a fueling station in your own garage to refill your vehicle. For those without natural gas service (yes, there are many areas that don't have gas lines), LPG is a viable alternative. Again, with a small amount of training, anybody can refill their own vehicle.
Batteries are heavy, expensive, full of toxic chemicals, and some require exotic metals that are in limited supply. They also require electricity to recharge them. Where is the electricity going to come from?
Wind power? Yeah, right! There are two huge wind farms in Montana. I recently made a trip that passed both of them, and they were both idle, no power being produced. So much for that idea.
Solar power? Where are you going to put the solar panels, and how much pollution will be produced in the manufacture of the panels? How much petrochemicals will be required to make the panels?
For that matter, how much petroleum is involved in the manufacture of an electric vehicle? How easily recyclable is an electric vehicle?
THINK instead of blindly following!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:09 AM
 
20,454 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Well the second one is now but what this has to do with what I said completely escapes me.

electric cars are a joke. sorry. they have very little real value. they are not "Green" and they are not the answer to reducing oil consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:17 AM
 
20,454 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
I really see the electric car as a boondoggle. building out a network to recharge is going to be very expensive. recharging the cars takes a lot of time.

The batteries are very difficult to deal with, they are expensive, when they go bad they are toxic. There is very little upside.

There are however other alternatives that can and will be game changers.

as I pointed out, Elio Motors is in the process of producing a car that gets 84 MPG in a gas powered engine. The car is a two seater and has a price point of $6800


I fully believe in my lifetime, there will be a shift from fossil fuel to some other major energy source. what that will be remains to be seen. But electricity is just too fickle.

If I were to bet, I would bet on some form of oil produced from living organizims like Algae or E Coli.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:27 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
Well, it WOULD enhance our health, no doubt about it.
We certainly can't go back to horse and buggy days, what would we do with all the horse excrement?
The best answer would be the broadcast power that Tesla was supposedly working on, and supposedly had almost perfected before he died.
Compressed natural gas (CNG) is a viable fuel, with much of the infrastructure already in place (there are natural gas lines all over the country), and all that is required is a fueling station in your own garage to refill your vehicle. For those without natural gas service (yes, there are many areas that don't have gas lines), LPG is a viable alternative. Again, with a small amount of training, anybody can refill their own vehicle.
I drove a NG delivery truck back in 1983. That said I do not want all of my neighbors with refilling stations in their garages nor is that practical.

So the infrastructure isnt in place right now. The range is still limited compared to gas also which I why I disliked the NG truck. Every morning I had to take it to get filled where with the other trucks one didn't.

Nothing wrong with NG but it's not a long range solution. IMO.

Quote:
Batteries are heavy, expensive, full of toxic chemicals, and some require exotic metals that are in limited supply. They also require electricity to recharge them. Where is the electricity going to come from?
The batteries in a Prius do not require electricity (as in an outside source) to recharge them.

This is what I find odd. You promote something that we do not have the infrastructure to make it practical but dismiss something that is being made better each year. The batteries in Hybrids have been improved upon quite a bit in the relatively few years they have been around.

I have no idea what advances in regenerative energy will come along in the next couple decades (the ability to recharge batteries while going downhill or braking) but I'm pretty exciting to see what they come up with. I have to believe that we aren't that far off to where we will have extended ranges on batteries with small auxiliary power sources to recharge the batteries.

Quote:
Wind power? Yeah, right! There are two huge wind farms in Montana. I recently made a trip that passed both of them, and they were both idle, no power being produced. So much for that idea.
Solar power? Where are you going to put the solar panels, and how much pollution will be produced in the manufacture of the panels? How much petrochemicals will be required to make the panels?
For that matter, how much petroleum is involved in the manufacture of an electric vehicle? How easily recyclable is an electric vehicle?
THINK instead of blindly following!
Please do. As I have already pointed out, the batteries are already easily recyclable and the cars themselves are no different than any other car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:29 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
electric cars are a joke. sorry. they have very little real value. they are not "Green" and they are not the answer to reducing oil consumption.
I was damned impressed with my dad's Prius. We took it on a trip and I did better than I would have in my diesel VW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top