Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statutedoes not necessarilyimply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes." http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf
So, the State Department has no opinion on that issue. How does that help you?
Break through the cloud of confusion and show me where any of the cases have discovered the inaccuracy of the WKA passage on which the ONE decision was based, the USCIS document stating one can be either a native-born citizen or a natural-born citizen, etc., etc.
You are asking us here to find a judge that agrees with you.
there were no such claim from any clinton campaign worker. there were clinton supporters that were early, but not the first, birthers. most notably phil berg that started the first birther lawsuit.
Unfortunately for you, "citizen" isn't the Constitutional requirement. One must be a "natural born citizen" and the USCIS clearly indicates that one can be a native born citizen but not a natural born citizen.
And that is why the INS distinction is Constitutionally irrelevant. All native born citizens are also natural born citizens.
That's exactly why Obama's purported POTUS eligibility is in doubt. It has NOT been adequately examined. Too many sources indicate Constitutional ineligibility.
He has been elected twice. The election has been unanimously certified by Congress twice. He is in his 5th year as president. More than 200 court cases challenging his eligibility have failed.
How again do you hallucinate that his eligibility is in doubt?
He has been elected twice. The election has been unanimously certified by Congress twice. He is in his 5th year as president. More than 200 court cases challenging his eligibility have failed.
How again do you hallucinate that his eligibility is in doubt?
I meant his application-please explain to me how he received a free ride as a transfer student when he was not a stellar student?
What makes you think he received a free ride?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnvrsoul
But again, he has never released his transcripts..wonder why?
The same reason no president in all of American history has ever voluntarily done so. If you can answer that question for Ronald Reagan, you'll have answered it for Obama.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The disconnect to reality is truly astounding.