Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statutedoes not necessarilyimply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes." http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf
Yeah, so indisputable that 201 judges have rejected them.
First it's 22, now it's 201. You're clearly confused.
Break through the cloud of confusion and show me where any of the cases have discovered the inaccuracy of the WKA passage on which the ONE decision was based, the USCIS document stating one can be either a native-born citizen or a natural-born citizen, etc., etc.
If you use oranges in the fruit salad, you are still using a citrus fruit.
Unfortunately for you, "citizen" isn't the Constitutional requirement. One must be a "natural born citizen" and the USCIS clearly indicates that one can be a native born citizen but not a natural born citizen.
Quote:
If you restore someone's citizenship that was native-born, that native-born citizenship is also natural-born citizenship.
"In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statutedoes not necessarilyimply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes." http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf
What branch of government does the State Department belong to?
Hint: The legislative branch makes laws, and the judiciary branch rules on the Constitutionality of laws. The executive branch enforces laws, but in the process of enforcing those laws, none of its decisions can be said to make law or to interpret the Constitution.
Unfortunately for you, "citizen" isn't the Constitutional requirement. One must be a "natural born citizen" and the USCIS clearly indicates that one can be a native born citizen but not a natural born citizen.
Only in InformedConsent's world. "Indicates" to you. Doesn't say it. Just "indicates" it for people who want to read meanings into remarks that aren't there. You think you can offer up an opinion, and that makes it true. Your arrogance is remarkable.
What branch of government does the State Department belong to?
Hint: The legislative branch makes laws, and the judiciary branch rules on the Constitutionality of laws. The executive branch enforces laws, but in the process of enforcing those laws, none of its decisions can be said to make law or to interpret the Constitution.
That's exactly why Obama's purported POTUS eligibility is in doubt. It has NOT been adequately examined. Too many sources indicate Constitutional ineligibility.
Only in InformedConsent's world. "Indicates" to you. Doesn't say it. Just "indicates" it for people who want to read meanings into remarks that aren't there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
