Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:07 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,687,867 times
Reputation: 5132

Advertisements

The first with a good, bold idea is always looked at askance. Palin was courageously outspoken and didn't "play the games", which was disturbing to so many who do.

Wonder how many of her other ideas are simmering on Obama's back burner, preparing for implementation creatively, in such a way that only he can take credit for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:11 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
Who cares? as long as its the right thing to do.
The right thing to do that never gets done is a bit of a waste.

Obama said he was against bringing lobbyists into his administration but as soon as he won he brought in lobbyists.

Are you saying it's O.K. to simply say the right things, that the actions don't matter?

Quote:
F all the politicians and their so called principals. They have none.

After its too late they finally do the right thing. After they read all the polls
The bailouts were highly unpopular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:11 AM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,734,435 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
The first with a good, bold idea is always looked at askance. Palin was courageously outspoken and didn't "play the games", which was disturbing to so many who do.

Wonder how many of her other ideas are simmering on Obama's back burner, preparing for implementation creatively, in such a way that only he can take credit for them.

Lets hope there are better ideas out there than Palin's or Mr President's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,171,657 times
Reputation: 4232
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
LOL, I knew the news that that mean socialist Obama is privatizing two government agencies would make Cons' heads explode. I was wondering how they'd spin it against him. Thanks for providing the answer! It's quite a creative one, so you get a gold star.


I have worked for BOTH Fannie and Freddie in my career. Neither are "government agencies". They are publically traded corporations. They were only chartered by the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:12 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
The first with a good, bold idea is always looked at askance. Palin was courageously outspoken and didn't "play the games", which was disturbing to so many who do.
Ron Paul called for it years and years before Palin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:14 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaten_Drinker View Post
I have worked for BOTH Fannie and Freddie in my career. Neither are "government agencies". They are publically traded corporations. They were only chartered by the government.
They are quasi government entities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:15 AM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,734,435 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The right thing to do that never gets done is a bit of a waste.

Obama said he was against bringing lobbyists into his administration but as soon as he won he brought in lobbyists.

Are you saying it's O.K. to simply say the right things, that the actions don't matter?



The bailouts were highly unpopular.
Im saying the exact opposite but accept that politicians rarely do the right thing.

The bailouts were not unpopular. They were viewed as necessary evil. The threat of financial ruin scared Americans into believeing bailing out the banksters and allowing them to continue their practice of greed and extortion was our only choice.

When the taxpayer has to bailout the banksters again I hold little confidence the taxpayer will fight back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,171,657 times
Reputation: 4232
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
They are quasi government entities.
No they are not. The Social Security Administration and the FAA are quasai govt entitites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:22 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
Im saying the exact opposite but accept that politicians rarely do the right thing.
Maybe you used the wrong word. Maybe you meant understand that they rarely do the right thing. I don't know why anyone would simply accept that they rarely do the right thing.

Quote:
The bailouts were not unpopular. They were viewed as necessary evil. The threat of financial ruin scared Americans into believeing bailing out the banksters and allowing them to continue their practice of greed and extortion was our only choice.

When the taxpayer has to bailout the banksters again I hold little confidence the taxpayer will fight back.
You forget the bail outs were initially voted down because of the complaints of the people. Even those who say they support it because of the politics argue against the very things it did.

Is there someone here that supports giving billions of dollars to Goldman Sachs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 07:22 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,687,867 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
The bailouts were not unpopular. They were viewed as necessary evil. The threat of financial ruin scared Americans into believeing bailing out the banksters and allowing them to continue their practice of greed and extortion was our only choice.
Key words: "The threat of financial ruin scared Americans..." you are so right.

And who, but Obama, the Democrats and the media employed all those scare tactics to achieve their ends?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top