Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-31-2013, 06:31 PM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,783,818 times
Reputation: 1461

Advertisements

Chicago Tribune

Surprised news media hasn't reported this.

Apparently the mortgage industry has lobbied hard and now the FHA is allowing even people who have had foreclosures and bankruptcy to be approved for FHA loans as soon as 12 months later.

This is crazy. There seems to be zero consequences from irresponsible borrowers. Come one. Give me a break. People say they fell on tough times etc. Yet I know of no one even with the who originally put down at least 20% downpayment even during the peak years (2005-2007) of losing their homes or declaring BK.

Yet there are millions of homeowners who put close to zero down who ended up losing their homes.

And now the government is allowing these same people who put close to zero down to try to get FHA loans (FHA loans can be obtained with as little as 3.5% down). So the least credit worthy people can obtained government backed loans with the least amont of downpayment? Seems counter intuitive to me. Doesn't it?

I doubt government is forcing these people who put down 20% with the FHA either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2013, 06:56 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
You missed the most important paragraph in the article. When you get a FHA loan with 3.5% down you are paying PMI for the entire life of the loan or until you refinance after your equity increases to 20%.

"But only certain consumers who’ve been in those circumstances will be able to meet the criteria attached to the eased restrictions. Borrowers must be able to show their household income fell by 20 percent or more for at least six months and was tied to unemployment or another event beyond their control. They also must prove they have had at least one hour of approved housing counseling and, among other things, have had 12 months of on-time housing payments."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:14 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,908,288 times
Reputation: 9252
Why not? They encouraged the lenders by bailing them out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:23 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,329,966 times
Reputation: 8066
All this does is tell you how weak the housing market still is. IMO the administration is desperate to get these numbers up before the 2014 elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:27 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Government has no authority to be in loan business, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
.
For nearly 80 years, FHA has helped home buyers purchase their first homes by offering loans that are easier to qualify for, require smaller down payments and at interest rates sometimes lower than they might otherwise get through a conventional loan. Historically, for millions of buyers who have decent -- but not stellar credit scores and haven't saved up a big down payment, the FHA has been a good deal.

FHA is insurance, not a loan. FHA is required to maintain a cash balance equal to at least 2% of all outstanding loans in its mortgage insurance funds. To do so, FHA now requires a 1.75% upfront fee and tacks on 1.35% insurance fee to each monthly payment for the life of the loan, regardless of the equity in the property on all new loans.

I tend to follow the money for answers. Speculation on my part is that it is necessary for FHA to insure X new loans to generate sufficient income to maintain the required balance, which may be why the length of time between a bankruptcy, foreclosure or short sale has been reduced in some situations.

Applications are being considered, when the applicant can demonstrate a one time loss of income of at least 20% related to circumstances beyond their control that served as a trigger event for bankruptcy, foreclosure or short sale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:37 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23891
Government serves big banks. Big banks need mortgage interest money.

Let me restate...

Big banks need risk free mortgage interest money - you know, the risk is not on the banks, but on the tax payers. Just like these reverse mortgages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Government has no authority to be in loan business, period.
Pre the Great Depression, folks typically needed a 50% down payment and mortgages matures in 5 years. At that time, the borrower could pay it off or refinance at current interest rates. In other words, borrowers took the lion's share of interest rate risks, back then.

Generally speaking, those banks which survived the Great Depression, refused to write new mortgages. Government created FHA and FNMA to allow people to buy a home. The GI bill allowed returning WW2 veterans to buy a home with no down payment. Over time, common mortgage maturities increased from 5 to 20 to 30 years and the interest rate risk was shifted from the borrower to the lender to the investor.

Had housing not recovered as it did after WW2, in the 50's, chances are we would still be recovering, 80 years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 07:41 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
.
For nearly 80 years, FHA has helped home buyers purchase their first homes by offering loans that are easier to qualify for, require smaller down payments and at interest rates sometimes lower than they might otherwise get through a conventional loan. Historically, for millions of buyers who have decent -- but not stellar credit scores and haven't saved up a big down payment, the FHA has been a good deal.

FHA is insurance, not a loan. FHA is required to maintain a cash balance equal to at least 2% of all outstanding loans in its mortgage insurance funds. To do so, FHA now requires a 1.75% upfront fee and tacks on 1.35% insurance fee to each monthly payment for the life of the loan, regardless of the equity in the property on all new loans.
And this government interference in the markets is why our economy is in the toilet, and we as a nation are incomprehensibly deep in debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top