Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes. I'm asking you to answer the question... From whom are the funds confiscated, and why?
Afraid to answer, are you, because you know it'll sink your house-of-cards bogus position on this?
Oh, sure, I'll answer. They impose costs and penalties on banks conducting business on American soil.
Why don't you answer my question, what do they do when the bank they want to collect costs and penalties from is the Ledbetter bank in Thamesbury which doesn't conduct any business on American soil.
Afraid to answer, are you, because you know it'll sink your house-of-cards bogus position on this?
That's a penalty on the bank, not your money.
They can't get your money until you are on US soil or your money is in a US bank account.
And the penalty to foreign banks is the reason they are now turning away expats who want to open accounts.
The foreign banks don't want to do the paperwork and if they don't they have to pay a fine to the US IRS and if they don't pay a fine then they can be prohibited from participating in SWIFT transactions.
You didn't prove anything with that because your money is still in your account and hasn't been touched.
I know. I'm confused too. You seem to be the only one not confused. Why won't you alleviate our confusion by posting a link to your source of what "permanent domicile"
Attus Black already defined the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark-era legal definition of "permanent domicile," here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attus Black
Permit me.....from the WKA in Grays opinion
Quote:
Chinese persons, born out of the United States, remaining subjects of the Emperor of China, and not having become citizens of the United States, are entitled to the protection of, and owe allegiance to, the United States so long as they are permitted by the United States to reside here
Because they are permitted by the US to reside here they have established a permanent domicile and residence.
Permanent domicile can currently be proven by possessing one of these, available since the late 1940's, early 1950's: USCIS - Green Card
Attus Black already defined the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark-era legal definition of "permanent domicile," here:
Permanent domicile can currently be proven by possessing one of these, available since the late 1940's, early 1950's: USCIS - Green Card
I'm still confused. Isn't someone who has a visa "permitted to stay here"? Anyone who is legally on US soil, tourist, student, is "permitted to stay here", aren't they?
I'm still confused. Isn't someone who has a visa "permitted to stay here"? Anyone who is legally on US soil, tourist, student, is "permitted to stay here", aren't they?
TEMPORARILY, with a noted expiration date, yes.
To wit, Obama's father's signed and submitted 1961 "APPLICATION TO EXTEND TEMPORARY STAY" listing his current permission to be in the U.S. set to expire on August 9, 1961:
Jurisdiction isn't just about passing laws. It's about enforcing those laws. When the IRS is knocking on the door of an American citizen in Bolivia who hasn't paid their taxes, and when they arrest that person on Bolivian soil, and put that person on trial in Bolivia, and throw them into a Bolivian jail, then you can show jurisdiction. So far, you can't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.