Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Do you not realize that when the rich benefit, everyone benefits? Or are you one of those who still thinks poor people create jobs and pay tax?
Haha, that is too funny. Thank you for that morning laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:53 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,462,865 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
It is impossible to tell what market impact there would have been with a different election result. What we can rely on is that laws and execution of the offices of government would have been tilted against the middle class and poor, against employees and retirees, and against compassion and consideration of others.
With "against compassion and consideration of others" meaning against compassion and consideration of liberal special interest groups.

Ask the non-union auto industry workers in Detroit how much compassion and consideration they were shown.

Quote:
Republicans in the White House would almost surely have promulgated policies that benefited the rich, the employer, and the brutalistic egoists of the right-wing.
As opposed to being tilted towards the brutalistic egoists of the left wing.

When you consider giving someone food stamps instead of giving them a job to be benefiting the poor, it's easy to set yourself up on a pedestal as being morally superior. But reality tells a different story as all the poor people the liberals are so concerned about remain poor. That's all liberal compassion does. It just keeps people at subsistence level permanently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,934,015 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Do you not realize that when the rich benefit, everyone benefits? Or are you one of those who still thinks poor people create jobs and pay tax?
LMAO!!!! I didn't realize people were still repeating the trickle down lie.

We have decades of statistics and economic data to show it has never worked since Reagan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:55 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,677,147 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
In my book, the U.S. economy is improving gradually and doing better than it was 4 or 5 years ago. The stock market has had an especially good run, thankfully. However, the economy is still far from doing great - as the unemployment rate is still 7.4%, the GDP growth is small and the national debt is very high and rising.
The fed is pumping hundreds of billions into the stock market, it's a balloon waiting to pop. The unemployment numbers are falling because our labor force is disappearing, even the U6 does not reflect how bad our unemployment situation has become.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
If Mitt Romney were president, do you think he would have been able to use his decades of business skills and knowledge to bring more positive numbers in the U.S. economy by now and going forward? What, if anything, could he have done differently?
I think Romney would have addressed the causes for our failing economy, where as Obama has been ignoring it, and even approving of the implementation of regulations that will harm growth and investments in the economy and increase energy costs.

By the time Obama's term is up, the economy will be in utter ruins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:57 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,261,937 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California View Post
The dems would have obstructed anything he proposed and the usual suspects in the press would have cheered them on for doing so. The leftwing loons here would have non-stop topics about "mittens".
Wait ... the cons keep telling us here that that's exactly the correct thing to do when we talk about the historic level of GOP obstructionism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:58 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,677,147 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
LMAO!!!! I didn't realize people were still repeating the trickle down lie.

We have years of statistics and economic data to show it has never worked since Reagan.
Except of course the Reagan economic boom that lasted for about twenty years. It took Clinton, Bush and Obama to finally strangle that golden goose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:59 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,135,767 times
Reputation: 5987
I truly believe it would have made no difference. I'm sure if Romney was elected you'd hear republicans moaning about the man. More of the same old bull chit....After all they get their marching orders not from American people and haven't for some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 09:59 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,677,147 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Wait ... the cons keep telling us here that that's exactly the correct thing to do when we talk about the historic level of GOP obstructionism.
What wonderful Obama economic policies that would have turned the economy around have the GOP obstructed, I'll wait.

Obama got his stimulus, and a bunch of smaller stimulus, and we were told we'd be at 6% or less unemployment by 2011. so i think your argument is all wet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Alaska
7,502 posts, read 5,751,017 times
Reputation: 4885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Do you not realize that when the rich benefit, everyone benefits? Or are you one of those who still thinks poor people create jobs and pay tax?
These groups are not smart enough to put the two together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Montgomery Village
4,112 posts, read 4,474,269 times
Reputation: 1712
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Except of course the Reagan economic boom that lasted for about twenty years. It took Clinton, Bush and Obama to finally strangle that golden goose.
You can't be serious. He's the one that got the ball rolling. The problem is that there was never a goose. Just a pile of gold flecked sh*t rolling downhill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top