Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:09 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
The thread may not be about Obama but you can still count on:


Liberal/Obama Supporter Auto Response Protocol™

1. The source isn't valid
2. That's racist
3. GOP obstruction
4. But...but...but George W. Bush
5. Haters gonna hate
6. Repeat 1,2,3,4 and/or 5 as needed then insult the opposition for failing to support this great man, declare victory, and move on
Quote:
You left out "an offensive video", "phony scandal", and "Halliburton!!!" .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,657,742 times
Reputation: 7485
Unfortunately, I am perceived by gun advocates as anti-gun because I believe that people should be trained and licensed to have a gun. Too many idiots and reprobates running around armed IMO. Unfortunately, instead of cleaning up the gene pool and shooting each other, they generally end up shooting bunches of innocent people. The Anti gunners think I'm progun because I have stated many times that I support the 2nd and own numerous handguns and rifles of the assault weapon variety.

Here's my take on concealed carry.

I agree with concealed carry if properly trained in safety, operation and legal ramifications. Arizona now has a CCW law that say's you can carry concealed without a license in certain places. I disagree with that and I have an actual Arizona CCW permit issued by DPS, our State Police. I was trained over a 3 day period in safety, operation, when to shoot and when to retreat, legal ramifications of pulling the trigger, etc. I was throughly background checked also. I agree with this type of concealed carry. When my CCW expired, I renewed it again through the Arizona DPS instead of just carrying concealed. As a gun owner I feel I have a responsibility to society as a whole and not just to the 2nd amendment.

I carry concealed, everywhere, all the time. I'm carrying now as I write this. In summer it's a Ruger LCP that is a little pocket pistol. In winter, it's a 9mm 12 shot, semi-auto pistol. My guns are always concealed except when I'm out in the desert away from the public. Then, it's a Ruger P90 45 auto for bear, cougar and rattlesnakes.

I firmly believe in concealed carry for the following reasons.
1. I am old. Very old. People like me are considered prey by the younger, drug addled crowd. They rob us in the WalMart parking lot, they carjack us at stoplights and they kick in our front doors at night and beat on us and take all our stuff. Half the time it's middle class teenagers who live down the block and they will kill you so you can't identify them, or so they think. Every body in my neighborhood knows me and knows I carry all the time. They know I'll shoot to kill the first person who tries to come through my door with criminal intent.

2. Carrying concealed in public is much safer than open carry. If a person intends to proceed with criminal action in a public place, if you open carry, he's gonna spot that when he cases the area. He'll shoot you first. CCW also doesn't scare the California transplants.

My short answer for anyone asking why I'm always armed, "I'm too old to fight and too proud to run".

Last edited by mohawkx; 08-26-2013 at 01:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:15 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,981,679 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
In the long run I do think that criminals would run out of guns.

There would also be an elegant way around the second amendment: people may keep their guns, but the possession of ammunition could be outlawed and severely punished, ammunition is not mentioned in the amendment

Another way would be to declare so many types of buildings and spaces weapon-free zones that there is no point in running around with guns anymore.

Where do gun crimes tend to be the most prevelant? Oh wait, gun free zones, and cities where there are limitations on gun ownership. It won't work. In a perfect world we wouldn't need guns. Unfortunately, this world isn't perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:16 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Unfortunately, I am perceived by gun advocates as anti-gun because I believe that people should be trained and licensed to have a gun.
No, because you believe government should have the authority to decide who can have a gun and who can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,657,742 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
The thread may not be about Obama but you can still count on:


Liberal/Obama Supporter Auto Response Protocolâ„¢

1. The source isn't valid
2. That's racist
3. GOP obstruction
4. But...but...but George W. Bush
5. Haters gonna hate
6. Repeat 1,2,3,4 and/or 5 as needed then insult the opposition for failing to support this great man, declare victory, and move on
Quote:
I'm a liberal in the eyes of the conservative posters here on P&OC and I just posted prior to reading this and I didn't post anything like what you're saying. Come Again????What exactly are you saying? Nothing........Nothing at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,731,689 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Unfortunately, I am perceived by gun advocates as anti-gun because I believe that people should be trained and licensed to have a gun. Too many idiots and reprobates running around armed IMO. Unfortunately, instead of cleaning up the gene pool and shooting each other, they generally end up shooting bunches of innocent people. The Anti gunners think I'm progun because I have stated many times that I support the 2nd and own numerous handguns and rifles of the assault weapon variety.

Here's my take on concealed carry.

I agree with concealed carry if properly trained in safety, operation and legal ramifications. Arizona now has a CCW law that say's you can carry concealed without a license in certain places. I disagree with that and I have an actual Arizona CCW permit issued by DPS, our State Police. I was trained over a 3 day period in safety, operation, when to shoot and when to retreat, leagl ramifications of pulling the trigger, etc. I was throughly background checked also. I agree with this type of concealed carry. When my CCW expired, I renewed it again through the Arizona DPS instead of just carrying concealed. As a gun owner I feel I have a responsibility to society as a whole and not just to the 2nd amendment.

I carry concealed, everywhere, all the time. I'm carrying now as I write this. In summer it's a Ruger LCP that is a little pocket pistol. In winter, it's a 9mm 12 shot, semi-auto pistol. My guns are always concealed except when I'm out in the desert away from the public. Then, it's a Ruger P90 45 auto for bear cougar and rattlesnakes.

I firmly believe in concealed carry for the following reasons.
1. I am old. Very old. People like me are considered prey by the younger, drug addled crowd. They rob us in the WalMart parking lot, they carjack us at stoplights and they kick in our front doors at night and beat on us and take all our stuff. Half the time it's middle class teenagers who live down the block and they will kill you so you can't identify them, or so they think. Every body in my neighborhood knows me and knows I carry all the time. They know I'll shoot to kill the first person who tries to come through my door with criminal intent.

2. Carrying concealed in public is much safer than open carry. If a person intends to proceed with criminal action in a public place, if you open carry, he's gonna spot that when he cases the area. He'll shoot you first. CCW also doesn't scare the California transplants.

My short answer for anyone asking why I'm always armed, "I'm too old to fight and too proud to run".
But don't you think there is something fundamentally wrong with society if you feel like you have to be armed in order to be safe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,657,742 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
No, because you believe government should have the authority to decide who can have a gun and who can't.
That's your conclusion and it's totally off base. I believe in the SCOTUS ruling of reasonable restrictions. I believe there should be a mechanism in place to screen out the Mentally deficient, felons and blatent idiots who have no knowledge or respect for guns or society. If I knew you personally, I'd bet a dollar to a donut that you'd be a prime candidate for the idiot squad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:23 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,153,884 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Actually (as I already pointed out) The data comes from people who didn't mind telling a complete stranger on the phone, that they had used their gun in a crime situation.

I have to wonder: How many people who had been in a tight situation before, gotten a call from this poll-taker, who told them he was from the government, and the person being called decided he was better off NOT telling this strange person from the gvovernment that he had pulled a gun on someone who threatened him? For fear that some demagoguic hysterical cometclear-type fanatic would turn it around and start insisting that he had, how should I say this, uh, lied or distorted what had happened?

A cometclear-type fanatic who wasn't there knew nothing, and cared less; but still decided to smear him and denigrate him for saying something that the fanatic didn't want to be true? And who then might sic the cops on him to investigate his use of a gun and plaster him all over the local papers? And so he decide to simply tell the strange government person on the phone, Gee, sorry, never heard of it, not that I know of, sorry I can't help.

And so, maybe there were many MORE defensive gun usages that were admmitted to these government people who called strangers on the phone?

Now that you mention it....
I have stated on a couple occasions my skepticism that gun control laws will curb violent crime. You will choose to ignore this and go with the obligatory caricature. You will look foolish when I remind you of this. Just as I am skeptical of claims that gun control laws will reduce crime, I am similarly skeptical of claims that more hand guns are used to stop crimes than in the commission of crimes, particularly when based upon "self-reporting." I'm having a medical procedure done this week and I wanted to get some stats on the probabilities of outcomes. Much of it was "self-reported" data. That's fine, but what counts is data that emerges from follow-up examinations by professionals of the patients, not what the patients perceive to be the outcomes. I am interested in data that is driven by investigations by authorities, in which we know there actually was a crime or threat of a crime and the details reveal that a gun was used to prevent a crime. I'm not interested in seeing data that is driven by "self-reporting" on this issue, just as you would probably be uninterested in data that concludes that racial discrimination is rampant in America, based solely upon "self-reported" perceptions of racial discrimination.

I am skeptical of the claims of gun control advocates and of gun rights absolutists. You are skeptical of one side of the equation.

BTW, do we have any rough estimates for how many crimes using guns go unreported in the United States? That would affect the ratio of guns used to prevent crimes versus guns used in the commission of crimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:25 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,153,884 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
No, because you believe government should have the authority to decide who can have a gun and who can't.
Are you arguing that the state has no authority to prohibit you from owning automatic weapons? Does the state have the authority to prohibit six year-olds from hunting? What about prohibiting convicted felons from owning firearms? Can the state do any of those things?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,657,742 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
But don't you think there is something fundamentally wrong with society if you feel like you have to be armed in order to be safe?
Yes. But you also have to deal with reality. The crime in my town of 11,000 is mostly committed by middle class white teens and young adults on drugs. I honestly don't think there are any African Americans in our town. I haven't seen one in over a month. The Mexicans don't commit crimes because they keep a low profile and stay out of the spotlight. Most work in the hospitality industry. Our town also has a lot of retirees. There's an urban myth out there that say's all us old people have all the money and stuff. All the disdain and hate directed towards old people comes from white middle class young adults. When you see a thread on C-D wailing against Baby Boomers, these are the same demographics who hate, rob and beat on old people. It's very common in AZ for a gang to kick in your door and rob you blind and beat you in the process. They cruise the interstate and do quick hits in small towns and are gone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top