Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why are you blaming Obama yet again? You realize it goes thru Congress, right? But no no no, we have to blame Obama again, it's what we do!!!!
You're stretching to not make The President the focal point. Mr. Obama is leading the charge - or so far has asked Mr. Kerry to lead his charge for him. He decided at the last minute to go to Congress. His administration has also allowed for the discussion about whether ornot he would still go through with it if Congress didn't support it. It's a big stretch to shift this away from him. If it were to go ahead, of course those that vote to support it from either side would also be responsible for the decision.
Either way, he fails in your eyes, right? Fails. Outright failure. No matter what. Just an abject failure.
Failure or not he has not been a leader. It's what I've said all about him from the beginning. He is not a leader but rather nothing more than what he is. A community organizer. This is a perfect example.
A community organizer stirs the pot and makes a mess and expects someone else to come in and find answers. That someone in this case appears to be Putin.
Obama is lead salesman for Syrian strikes to congress and the world, is he not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr
You're stretching to not make The President the focal point. Mr. Obama is leading the charge - or so far has asked Mr. Kerry to lead his charge for him. He decided at the last minute to go to Congress. His administration has also allowed for the discussion about whether ornot he would still go through with it if Congress didn't support it. It's a big stretch to shift this away from him. If it were to go ahead, of course those that vote to support it from either side would also be responsible for the decision.
And if Congress approves, will you still lay 100% blame on Obama? Of course you will!!!! You're so predictable.
And if Congress approves, will you still lay 100% blame on Obama? Of course you will!!!! You're so predictable.
What is predictable is you not reading my whole post - you know, the part where I said, "If it were to go ahead, of course those that vote to support it from either side would also be responsible for the decision."
Folks slow down. Obama admin is walking this back they are both downplaying Kerrys comments and Russian offer while claiming the Russian offer is a result of the threat of force.
Folks slow down. Obama admin is walking this back they are both downplaying Kerrys comments and Russian offer while claiming the Russian offer is a result of the threat of force.
Again amateur hour.
I think Russia's offer is the result of the UN finally getting its s**t together:
Quote:
"I am considering urging the Security Council to demand the immediate transfer of Syria’s chemical weapons and chemical precursor stocks to places inside Syria where they can be safely stored and destroyed," Mr. Ban said.
Stall tactic to allow Bing bong to step back behind his red line.
It may not have been a smart thing to say, but at least he's stepping back. I don't recall W stepping back from his infamous "significant quantities of Uranium from Africa" bulls**t.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I feel better with thought and hope things go well.
