Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-29-2013, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
But but but...I thought he was a radical communist Muslim Kenyan? My apologies if I can't keep up.
If you are a bi-partisan hack that still supports Republicans or Democrats than I can understand why you'd think that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-29-2013, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Fort Payne Alabama
2,558 posts, read 2,902,918 times
Reputation: 5014
My answer is yes, no matter what any candidate says prior to being elected, no matter what party, once they get in office they find out that the Military Industrial Complex is actually in charge. War of any kind is their agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 11:02 AM
 
78,366 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49644
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
I'm quoting US Military Generals as my source of information. You are quoting anonymous City-Data posters as yours. Do I really need to respond?
From your own linked article he stated he saw that memo somewhere around October 2001.

So here you are referencing that memo and the 5 year horizon of attack culminating with Iran.

You do know it's 2013 right?

I guess you are missing the point that we've been hearing this stuff for over 10 years, I'm of course showing the track record of failed predictions oh great Karnak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
From your own linked article he stated he saw that memo somewhere around October 2001.

So here you are referencing that memo and the 5 year horizon of attack culminating with Iran.

You do know it's 2013 right?

I guess you are missing the point that we've been hearing this stuff for over 10 years, I'm of course showing the track record of failed predictions oh great Karnak.
So, it's safe to assume that you completely support military intervention in Syria and also supported it in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and will support it in Iran or any other country in the region.

Care to give any reasons? You are in the very slim minority, as most Americans hold the opposite opinion of you.
You are focused on an exact timeline while everyone else has noticed the pattern of waste and failure in the Middle East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 12:17 PM
 
4,130 posts, read 4,460,290 times
Reputation: 3041
Yeah, invading 7 countries in 5 years which...never happened. From an never named source (or remotely identified source) right after 9/11 whose goal was to invade 6 countries for no reason but to invade the 7th. Simply because, well there is no reason to do so and waste all that money and military resources.

Now it is somehow true because Syria is killing civilians and attacking the UN?

Is this a joke?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 12:41 PM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,734,984 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
If you are a bi-partisan hack that still supports Republicans or Democrats than I can understand why you'd think that.
That would be "partisan hack". Just my ocd to correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
>>> Bush 3 is in the White House.
yep

carter, bush1, clinton, bush2, obama.....a globalist progressives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
That would be "partisan hack". Just my ocd to correct.
Haha, it's cool...my point still stands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,576,379 times
Reputation: 9030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
Russia and China are not that invested in Syria.
So, the USA IS??????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldCityWanderer View Post
Yeah, invading 7 countries in 5 years which...never happened. From an never named source (or remotely identified source) right after 9/11 whose goal was to invade 6 countries for no reason but to invade the 7th. Simply because, well there is no reason to do so and waste all that money and military resources.

Now it is somehow true because Syria is killing civilians and attacking the UN?

Is this a joke?
Are you joking? Have you never heard of the Military Industrial Complex? People make a killing in war. Unfortunately, our service men and women get the literal type of killing while Multi-National Corporations get the figurative type-IE BILLIONS in PROFIT via colluded contracts.

The War on "Terror" is a farce and is only meant to enrich the elite in a never ending war that they never suffer the consequences from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top