U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-03-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,656 posts, read 33,925,527 times
Reputation: 40062

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
All you said was calluses on my fingers does not equal evolution. Brilliant argument professor!

It doesn't. There is no change in genome. Evolution is change in genome over time (don't confuse that with the engine of evolution, which is natural selection, those are two different things).

Lamarck proposed the inheritable trait theory and his theory was dis-proven.

I'm think you simply do not know what evolution is.
Rate this post positively

 
Old 10-03-2013, 01:00 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,656 posts, read 33,925,527 times
Reputation: 40062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Man in their limited minds can't figure out what God created..they try but think they know.. the ego of man is so big. As if they can control it all.

If man did not exist it would all still be here.. we didn't create the mountains, the plants or animals.. we just wonder how and why and guess most of the time..

We are born and we die. We did not get here but by God's design. Man will never be able to know all that God created. It is too vast and too complicated for them to find out.. they only see a shadow , the natural laws that God put in place.. Man is small compared to God and his knowing all.

Sorry, I'm not superstitious.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 01:00 PM
 
511 posts, read 772,172 times
Reputation: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
It doesn't. There is no change in genome. Evolution is change in genome over time (don't confuse that with the engine of evolution, which is natural selection, those are two different things).

Lamarck proposed the inheritable trait theory and his theory was dis-proven.

I'm think you simply do not know what evolution is.
I see evolution as the body adapting change based on environmental factors. Hey fine, if I'm wrong about my example, I'm wrong.

You see, I have no shame or inability to admit that I can be wrong in my comments. Your side? I've never seen it once. NEVER. It's all about you, and everyone must believe exactly like you, or you blow up and get hateful if people don't.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:35 PM
 
511 posts, read 772,172 times
Reputation: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
So isn't oral sex, and that is as natural as it comes. Human and non human primates engage in it.
God created human beings with extremely sensitive genitals for the purpose of stimulation and pleasure. Oral sex is just another form of stimulation. It's natural. If anal sex was natural, it wouldn't be so harmful to our bodies.


Sex is God's gift to man, but as usual, man screws it up and distorts it. Just like man screws up the food supply ruining God's natural food source of fruits and vegetables with chemicals and crap. Just like man has screwed up the environment.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,223 posts, read 13,422,906 times
Reputation: 9847
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
God created human beings with extremely sensitive genitals for the purpose of stimulation and pleasure. Oral sex is just another form of stimulation. It's natural. If anal sex was natural, it wouldn't be so harmful to our bodies.


Sex is God's gift to man, but as usual, man screws it up and distorts it. Just like man screws up the food supply ruining God's natural food source of fruits and vegetables with chemicals and crap. Just like man has screwed up the environment.
Then why is the prostate (the male g spot) inside of the anus? Did god make a mistake?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:38 PM
 
15,720 posts, read 11,287,753 times
Reputation: 7007
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
Give me one example a physical trait that an ancient human being had that we no longer have. I'm not talking about primate ancestors. Human beings.
At what point in human evolution do you want? We used to have tails (and human embryos still develop one for 4 weeks of gestation).
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,296 posts, read 35,787,713 times
Reputation: 13738
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
Small mutations and changes within the same species is a fact. When I started playing guitar, it hurt like hell on my fingers. Then my body adapted and created thick calluses so I could play pain free. That's evolution.

One species changing into a completely different species over billions of years? Not so much fact.
This really is getting hilarious...Your calluses are evolution? I laughed so hard I spilled my coffee....
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:40 PM
 
15,720 posts, read 11,287,753 times
Reputation: 7007
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
God created human beings with extremely sensitive genitals for the purpose of stimulation and pleasure. Oral sex is just another form of stimulation. It's natural. If anal sex was natural, it wouldn't be so harmful to our bodies.
Anal sex is practiced by most animal species. How is that not natural? And as jjrose said, the prostate is the Male G spot and is surrounded by sexually stimulated nerve endings. Did that happen by accident?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,296 posts, read 35,787,713 times
Reputation: 13738
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
If they are engaging in anal sex, there are still the other health risks. From what I've read, gays are much more likely to have multiple sexual partners than straight people too especially when you consider that a large number of lesbians have a history of male partners.
If that bothers you and were true, then you should be fighting to allow gay marriage....Married people generally have only one partner.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:42 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,656 posts, read 33,925,527 times
Reputation: 40062
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdave35 View Post
God created human beings with extremely sensitive genitals for the purpose of stimulation and pleasure. Oral sex is just another form of stimulation. It's natural. If anal sex was natural, it wouldn't be so harmful to our bodies.

You do know oral sex is sodomy too, right? So is only one type of sodomy bad?

"Regular" sex can be harmful to our bodies too, so that is "bad"?
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 AM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top