Why are conservatives against Obama going to war with Syria?

[michiganmoon]

Originally Posted by Citykid55

I mean, IT'S WHAT DUBYA Would've done...

Miss Cleo,
You don't know for sure what Bush would have done. But you do make a good point about Obama and Bush being hard to distinguish apart.

St. Pete for Peace

I don't want to kill Syrian civilians while being Al Qaeda's air force.

[city414]

Originally Posted by kidkaos2

We are against going to war with Syria because it's the wrong thing to do. It's irrelevant what Bush would have done. I realize the concept of having principles is difficult to understand for many liberals, but that's the reason we are against war with Syria.

See, both your President and your Vice President publicly said that Bush had no authority to attack a nation without congressional approval. Then they got into office and attacked Libya. Without congressional approval.

And unlike Obama, Bush did get congressional approval for the attacks he made.

So sorry to inform you that your attempt to say conservatives are hypocrites is a failure. The hypocrites here are the Democrats.

tHE US did not lead the libya invasion, republicans wanted the US to be the frontrunners in removing ghadaffi and arming al qaeda/ rebels

[city414]

Originally Posted by michiganmoon

Miss Cleo,
You don't know for sure what Bush would have done. But you do make a good point about Obama and Bush being hard to distinguish apart.

St. Pete for Peace

I don't want to kill Syrian civilians while being Al Qaeda's air force.

Whats the difference from any other time of aiding terrorist cells..Why is it a problem now?