Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2013, 10:06 AM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,521,064 times
Reputation: 3261

Advertisements

God, obama supporters are idiots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2013, 11:33 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
I think this says it all. Why am I not surprised? Obamacare is helping everyone BUT the people it is supposed to help. To US, the people of the United States it is supposed to help, it is simply costing more money, and nothing has been gained in return.....




Early big winners of ObamaCare: investors, lawyers, consultants, tech experts | Fox News
soo... this journalist is saying that Obamacare caused the stock market to rise?

also, someone should tell him that it is spelled "Deloitte", not "Deloit."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2013, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,922 posts, read 2,778,970 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
The biggest winners are:
  • The working poor who couldn't afford healthcare previously, but can now due to subsidies.
  • Those poor folks who will specifically benefit from Medicaid expansions.
  • Those who were previously unable to access or afford health insurance due to preexisting conditions.
  • Those who were previously unable to access or afford health insurance due to lifetime caps.
ACA critics work very hard to blind themselves, and perhaps others, to the fact that ACA is actually going to serve up very important, valuable benefits, in terms of reducing the human costs of our nation's previous healthcare system. I suspect that they do so because they only really care about themselves, and couldn't care less about others; and refusing to acknowledge the high human cost paid today by other people, who they would rather ignore rather than show human compassion toward, serves their avaricious interests.

In the end, and even though ACA critics will deny it and vacuously beat their chests in protest, it really comes down to human values: If all you value is your own money, then you're going to (literally) hate ACA. If you have a healthy balance of consideration of your own comfort and luxury with other people's basic needs, then you're going to support ACA.

And nobody is going to get screwed right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2013, 04:03 PM
 
1,806 posts, read 1,737,946 times
Reputation: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
I think this says it all. Why am I not surprised? Obamacare is helping everyone BUT the people it is supposed to help. To US, the people of the United States it is supposed to help, it is simply costing more money, and nothing has been gained in return.....




Early big winners of ObamaCare: investors, lawyers, consultants, tech experts | Fox News
Why do my fellow conservatives on here make such poor arguments. The stocks went up but you didn't talk about how they went up in relation to the overall market going up. Fail. You didn't show any proof that their going up was related to healthcare reform. Fail. The link isn't even your own opinion. Fail. You also didn't mention things like coverage for people with pre-existing conditions that make for people who are winners. You also didn't talk about how the free loaders will now have to step up and get healthcare instead of leeching off of the system. Fail.

Go back to the start and make a better argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 02:37 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,707,908 times
Reputation: 8798
No one is going to get "screwed" by ACA. Some people won't benefit. Some people will pay more money than before. Some people will miss getting subsidies by a dollar. Some other changes will take place that won't be happy happy love love changes. Get over it. Not everything in life has to break your way. Not everything is always perfect, especially when you have to placate the blue dogs, and keep the RWNJs from filibustering. But, regardless, sometimes it is more important to address matters of human decency, addressing the most basic needs of others, rather than making it easier for you to afford the latest smartphone, or making your next vacation more extravagant. It doesn't always have to be all about you all of the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 03:40 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by remoddahouse View Post
Why do my fellow conservatives on here make such poor arguments. The stocks went up but you didn't talk about how they went up in relation to the overall market going up. Fail. You didn't show any proof that their going up was related to healthcare reform. Fail. The link isn't even your own opinion. Fail. You also didn't mention things like coverage for people with pre-existing conditions that make for people who are winners. You also didn't talk about how the free loaders will now have to step up and get healthcare instead of leeching off of the system. Fail.

Go back to the start and make a better argument.
Actually, YOU need to go back to the start and read what the thread is about.. Who are the BIG winners... I wasn't talking about healthcare, coverage for people, costs, freeloaders, etc. I was talking about, who is making money off of it right now! So, Unless you can point out how I was wrong to point out an article that shows how people are getting rich off of obamacare, then you have failed in your sophomoric rant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 05:10 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,707,908 times
Reputation: 8798
I think you have some work to do yourself, to prove that those folks wouldn't have "won" regardless of ACA.

For example, your point is that investors' advantages were safeguarded - meaning that without ACA they would have gotten the same. No, not more: Medical Loss Ratio is a cost to investors in health insurance companies, that's basically balanced against the advantages investors can expect from Individual Mandate, for example. So ... the same. No difference. Investors in companies that provide health service have a similar balancing, stemming from Medicaid expansion forcing them to provide more service to more people, at a very low rate.

Harming investors was not the point of ACA. Making healthcare affordable to many who couldn't afford it previously was the point, and what it achieves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 05:49 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
No one is going to get "screwed" by ACA. Some people won't benefit. Some people will pay more money than before. Some people will miss getting subsidies by a dollar. Some other changes will take place that won't be happy happy love love changes. Get over it. Not everything in life has to break your way. Not everything is always perfect, especially when you have to placate the blue dogs, and keep the RWNJs from filibustering. But, regardless, sometimes it is more important to address matters of human decency, addressing the most basic needs of others, rather than making it easier for you to afford the latest smartphone, or making your next vacation more extravagant. It doesn't always have to be all about you all of the time.
I'll never understand how one would support a program which increases taxes, makes it harder to keep your own insurance, leaves 30,000,000 people uninsured, cuts hours thereby requiring people to work a 2nd job, and doesnt fix a dam thing = human decency to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 05:52 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
I think you have some work to do yourself, to prove that those folks wouldn't have "won" regardless of ACA.

For example, your point is that investors' advantages were safeguarded - meaning that without ACA they would have gotten the same. No, not more: Medical Loss Ratio is a cost to investors in health insurance companies, that's basically balanced against the advantages investors can expect from Individual Mandate, for example. So ... the same. No difference. Investors in companies that provide health service have a similar balancing, stemming from Medicaid expansion forcing them to provide more service to more people, at a very low rate.

Harming investors was not the point of ACA. Making healthcare affordable to many who couldn't afford it previously was the point, and what it achieves.
Someone has their head up their ass because there isnt a dam thing in Obamacare designed to keep costs low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 05:56 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,707,908 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Quote:
sometimes it is more important to address matters of human decency, addressing the most basic needs of others, rather than making it easier for you to afford the latest smartphone, or making your next vacation more extravagant
I'll never understand
I've come to accept that some folks have a vested interest in working hard not to understand the moral imperative of prioritizing the basic human needs of others over their own personal comfort and luxury.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Quote:
Making healthcare affordable to many who couldn't afford it previously was the point, and what it achieves.
Someone has their head up their ass because there isnt a dam thing in Obamacare designed to keep costs low.
"Someone has their head up their ass because" nothing in the comment that person replied to said anything about keeping costs low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top