Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The US government, embracing tenents of socialism from the initiative of the Johnson "Great Soceity" push, has embraced WIC and financial support for mothers with dependent children, regardless of the ability of the parents to provide or create a situation for productive citizens among their progeny.
Anyone with a brain in their head (liberals are allowed to "take a knee" for this discussion) would conclude that the least intelligent, least inventive among our society, if given a financial incentive to reproduce, would do so, in order to capture "incentives" provided by a misguided, confused liberal government.
Of course, this has been realized. If the least creative, least productive, are assingned to a lower economic class, one would assume, in the absence of external influences, that the lower socio-economic class would have a lower birth rate, consistent with their ability to support children.
With the modern welfare state, the whole concept of Prodictity confers more progeny (which is what would advance society) is turned upside down , and the least intelligent and productive are provided incentives for reproduction.
The net effect- More liberal policy= More citizens with lower IQs and less incentive to work. It is clear-liberalism promotes the destruction of society and reduced productivity of a nation. This insures more liberal politicians, yet ultimately results in the self destruction of the the nation.
Which do we choose? Placating liberals now, ensuring the demise of the nation? Or acknowledging reality and stop supporting self destructive national policy?
[quote=hawkeye2009;31306157]The US government, embracing tenents of socialism from the initiative of the Johnson "Great Soceity" push, has embraced WIC and financial support for mothers with dependent children, regardless of the ability of the parents to provide or create a situation for productive citizens among their progeny.
Anyone with a brain in their head (liberals are allowed to "take a knee" for this discussion) would conclude that the least intelligent, least inventive among our society, if given a financial incentive to reproduce, would do so, in order to capture "incentives" provided by a misguided, confused liberal government.
Of course, this has been realized. If the least creative, least productive, are assingned to a lower economic class, one would assume, in the absence of external influences, that the lower socio-economic class would have a lower birth rate, consistent with their ability to support children.
With the modern welfare state, the whole concept of Prodictity confers more progeny (which is what would advance society) is turned upside down , and the least intelligent and productive are provided incentives for reproduction.
The net effect- More liberal policy= More citizens with lower IQs and less incentive to work. It is clear-liberalism promotes the destruction of society and reduced productivity of a nation. This insures more liberal politicians, yet ultimately results in the self destruction of the the nation.
Which do we choose? Placating liberals now, ensuring the demise of the nation? Or acknowledging reality and stop supporting self destructive national policy?[/quote]
I say go with your belief, and get as much support from as many "like thinking" voting Americans as you can.
If you and your fellow Americans are the majority, then "liberal" policies can be changed.
People with any semblance of intelligence will only have as many children as they can afford, people of low intelligence will have as many children as the welfare system will pay for and at this point there is no limit. The kids are nothing more than cash cows for these single mother parents, raised in the street to become criminals and we now have a generation of idiots who do not want to learn or work. The public school system has had to dumb down the curriculum for these morons and many still graduate illiterate and dumber than a box of rocks. A program(welfare) that was started with good intentions has become a way of life for some and it is coming back to haunt us. When in Gods name will we ever learn that giving people free stuff creates absolutely no incentive to do anything with ones life. I fear that the stupid will soon out number the smart people in this country and we will have a nation of people that are capable of doing nothing but drooling and dependent entirely on handouts. Thank you Lyndon Johnson for a legacy we will never shed.
The US government, embracing tenents of socialism from the initiative of the Johnson "Great Soceity" push, has embraced WIC and financial support for mothers with dependent children, regardless of the ability of the parents to provide or create a situation for productive citizens among their progeny.
Anyone with a brain in their head (liberals are allowed to "take a knee" for this discussion) would conclude that the least intelligent, least inventive among our society, if given a financial incentive to reproduce, would do so, in order to capture "incentives" provided by a misguided, confused liberal government.
Of course, this has been realized. If the least creative, least productive, are assingned to a lower economic class, one would assume, in the absence of external influences, that the lower socio-economic class would have a lower birth rate, consistent with their ability to support children.
With the modern welfare state, the whole concept of Prodictity confers more progeny (which is what would advance society) is turned upside down , and the least intelligent and productive are provided incentives for reproduction.
The net effect- More liberal policy= More citizens with lower IQs and less incentive to work. It is clear-liberalism promotes the destruction of society and reduced productivity of a nation. This insures more liberal politicians, yet ultimately results in the self destruction of the the nation.
Which do we choose? Placating liberals now, ensuring the demise of the nation? Or acknowledging reality and stop supporting self destructive national policy?
We have no nation if we refuse to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. People do not determine their IQ's. If a low IQ means they can't find work, society owes it to them to take care of them.
We have no nation if we refuse to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. People do not determine their IQ's. If a low IQ means they can't find work, society owes it to them to take care of them.
The weak & freaks, will always pull down the herd, unless they get culled from the herd.
We have no nation if we refuse to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. People do not determine their IQ's. If a low IQ means they can't find work, society owes it to them to take care of them.
They(low IQ) need to realize they do not have what it takes and take their proper place in society. There are jobs for these people, just not as CEO's of fortune 500 companies.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
