Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2013, 07:01 PM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
If not, then why not??

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?
Because no other nation, the US included, has not used chemical weapons in any hostile action...and no nation is being accused of using chemical weapons against their own people.

That's why.




The President of the United State is about to speak to the people...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2013, 07:06 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,497,759 times
Reputation: 9263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Because no other nation, the US included, has not used chemical weapons in any hostile action...and no nation is being accused of using chemical weapons against their own people.

That's why.




The President of the United State is about to speak to the people...
Is it possible to use a chemical in a non hostile way?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:14 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 27 days ago)
 
27,646 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Waco. Look it up.
Where was the international community and the red line?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:18 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 27 days ago)
 
27,646 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
More pro-Assad propaganda.
you and aero guy are on the same page on this story... how does it feel to reach across the isle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:23 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,442,882 times
Reputation: 4070
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
If not, then why not??

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?
Call the pentagon. Demand they add their chemicals to the pile being turned over by Assad. Inform your senators and congressman that you expect their support.

Please update us on your progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 01:18 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,837,332 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Waco. Look it up.
there is a huge difference between tear gas, like that used at waco, and nerve gas, like that used in iraq and syria. tear gas is not considered a deadly gas, sarin is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 03:43 AM
 
27,142 posts, read 15,313,785 times
Reputation: 12071
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
No, we don't use them on our own people.




We have also agreed not to use them on others so...............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 06:57 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Get back to us with that question after we've gassed our own people.


Ken
Sorry, Ken, but that's not the criteria of the Treaty we signed, and that Syria is contemplating signing.

Read the link or remain ignorant. Up to you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemica...ons_Convention
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 06:59 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Haha... well this thread went down in flames fast.
Read the link or remain ignorant. Up to you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemica...ons_Convention
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 07:02 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
I don't think we or any other country needs to unless they are determined to use it on people.
Chemical Weapons Convention - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top