Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2013, 01:35 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,699 times
Reputation: 1067

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Yes.....Democrats STILL haven't fixed the problem between 2008 to the present!!!

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2013, 01:38 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,542,326 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
Yes.....Democrats STILL haven't fixed the problem between 2008 to the present!!!

Posted with TapaTalk
The only thing they've done is bail out and print.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,615,131 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
More proof that is all false....

New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae - NYTimes.com

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.
Thank you for proving my point. That is exactly what I have been saying. The problem with transferring regulation from Congress to White House / Treasury is that it's an obvious power grab, and unconstitutional, and was laughed out of Congress by GOP.

You do know the Sec Of Treasury is a part of the Admin, don't you? Basically Bush tried to transfer the power of regulation to HIMSELF, and as a result that power would now belong to Obama. Would you be happy with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 01:45 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,930,930 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Look at when Basel II was being tied up.
Nov 2007
FRB: Press Release--Board approves final rules to implement Basel II risk-based capital framework--November 2, 2007
quote:
The Federal Reserve Board on Friday approved final rules to implement new risk-based capital requirements in the United States for large, internationally active banking organizations.


Jul 2013
FRB: Testimony--Tarullo, Dodd-Frank Implementation--July 11, 2013
quote:
Implementation of Basel III Capital Rules
Let me begin by noting the completion of our major rule makings on capital regulation. Although most of the provisions in these rules do not directly implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, implementation of that law is occurring against the backdrop of implementation of the Basel III framework.

This month, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved final rules implementing the Basel III capital framework, as well as certain related changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
You still haven't explained how anything you argue is true.
I'm not making an argument, just citing recent history.

Did you have something to deny again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,138 posts, read 5,801,988 times
Reputation: 7706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Yet the conservative narrative is oh its those people you know poor people, hispanic people, BLACK people who caused it all because banks were forced to lend to them. Its the homosexual Barney Frank who is too blame. THis is a HATEFUL and a dishonest response.
THat is HATEFUL and a dishonest accusation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 03:46 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
I'm not making an argument, just citing recent history.

Did you have something to deny again?
No, YOU have something to explain.

Quote:
Explain how Fannie and Freddie were "deregulation".

Explain how Fannie and Freddie were "let the market decide"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
No, YOU have something to explain.

Explain how Frank, a minority member on the House Committee, overruled all those majority GOP members in making policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 07:28 PM
 
22,661 posts, read 24,589,306 times
Reputation: 20339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
It was GOP policy all the way.

Tax cuts/trickle down

Deregulation

Let the market decide

All that stuff was in play until the deregulated manipulators on Wall St had pushed things so far over the edge, the market decided that they should all go broke. At that point, all of a sudden the battle cry changed to "privatized wealth, socialized debt."


FUNNNEEEE, the last economic downturn is generally recognized to emanate from the explosion of a massive housing bubble.

That housing bubble was created, for the most part.....by government manipulation and meddling. The US housing market is totally rigged and manipulated by the Federal Government..............free market.........LMFAO!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 08:03 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,699 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Thank you for proving my point. That is exactly what I have been saying. The problem with transferring regulation from Congress to White House / Treasury is that it's an obvious power grab, and unconstitutional, and was laughed out of Congress by GOP.
Laughable response and completely inaccurate!

First...it's not unconstitutional if Congress votes for it and passes it.

Second...it's not a power grab to appoint a special regulator to work within the Treasury Department and give the authority to appoint directors of Fanny & Freddie away from the President TO Congress.

Third...Congress never got to vote on this proposal because it didn't make it bout of committee!

I really have to wonder about your ability to read plain English?




Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top