Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013, 10:04 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskydude View Post
FDR put a lot of folks to work .. Dams, Bridges, National Infrastructure ...

(FDR of course, was called out a few times on just how constitutional, or not, some of his policies were, but just the same .. people during FDR's term(s) went straight to work)
Both chambers of Congress were with him during all three terms.

There was no issue funding the WPA which came in about 5 years into the Great Depression and persisted till WW2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2013, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
The Fed = The Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Urban Dictionary: the fed

But, IMO you're right that the New Deal put a lot of people to work, and I think a similar sort of thing is needed today; however, it was Congress that enabled FDR to pass the New Deal. He didn't do it all by himself. That's what is missing today: a congress that's willing to print money to put idle people back to work.
The Democrats held the majority of both chambers during FDR's 3 terms.

Had it not been for WW2, no clue how long it might have taken to recover from the Great Depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 05:18 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,931,696 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Goldman is making it on both ends. The markets were never meant to be manipulated by the government.
Which ends? Long and Short? They are indeed doing well. I think the OCC said they have a little under 44tril in deriv contracts. But JPM has like 70. Both are govt shareholder controlled. The market is far more than manipulated. It is almost completely owned by govt.
Like 232 tril in derivative contracts for US banks. 93% is with the Big 4 banks. Looks like 60% are IRS. JPM has another special advantage there, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 05:43 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
Which ends? Long and Short? They are indeed doing well. I think the OCC said they have a little under 44tril in deriv contracts. But JPM has like 70. Both are govt shareholder controlled. The market is far more than manipulated. It is almost completely owned by govt.
Like 232 tril in derivative contracts for US banks. 93% is with the Big 4 banks. Looks like 60% are IRS. JPM has another special advantage there, as well.
We know they were selling investments to their customers and then betting against them. It's crazy that after that people would still do business with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,270 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15639
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Why would a company hire 100 more workers if it has been demonstrated that the company can operate efficiently without them?
o fan of huge bonuses for CEO's but then I also understand if you want the best leadership in this country you have to pay for it.
No issue with leadership but CEO pay for many companies is approved by a board of directors that is comprised of insiders that regularly approve increases. The compensation committee's that determine the value of a CEO are also a joke in many cases, imagine driving a company into the ground and receiving a bonus. I don't question there are good CEO's that are deserving but that is many times not the case, if the banking CEO's were really worth their pay they should have been aware of what was going on in 2007-2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:17 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
U.S. corporations will need to disclose how their chief executive officers' paychecks compare with those of their workers under a proposal unveiled on Wednesday by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Feds to CEOs: Reveal how much you earn versus workers - NBC News.com

I find it interesting our Government, which is made up of lawmakers that can vote themselves a raise at anytime, can take millions of dollars from corporations to get elected and can trade with inside information with impunity is trying to control the Corporate pay scale.
What business is it of theirs what a CEO gets paid, whether in relation to "workers" or for any other reason?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:22 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
What business is it of theirs what a CEO gets paid, whether in relation to "workers" or for any other reason?
disclosure to shareholders.

you know, the people who own the company?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:24 AM
 
45,225 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
disclosure to shareholders.

you know, the people who own the company?
So its no bushiness of the federal government, nor should taxpayer monies be used in any effort to collect such data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:27 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So its no bushiness of the federal government, nor should taxpayer monies be used in any effort to collect such data.

i know how y'all want to go back to the roaring 20's and all... but it is the federal government's job to regulate the securities markets.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/secur...ge_act_of_1934
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 06:29 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
it is the federal government's job to regulate the securities markets.
I wonder when they will start?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top