Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I was told that it was Obama's sequester and it was a bad thing. That's what conservatives told me. So you agree with Obama's sequester and that the cuts were a good thing?
No YOU projected that it was a bad thing, in fact it was so horrible that you created a thread on it, blaming Paul Ryan...
No YOU projected that it was a bad thing, in fact it was so horrible that you created a thread on it, blaming Paul Ryan...
Right and then I was told that it was Obama's fault and it was Obama's sequester. What I'm having trouble understanding is if this is Obama's sequester then why does the House GOP think we should keep the sequestration spending levels in place?
Right and then I was told that it was Obama's fault and it was Obama's sequester. What I'm having trouble understanding is if this is Obama's sequester then why does the House GOP think we should keep the sequestration spending levels in place?
Voices in one's head can not be debated on a message forum.
Right and then I was told that it was Obama's fault and it was Obama's sequester. What I'm having trouble understanding is if this is Obama's sequester then why does the House GOP think we should keep the sequestration spending levels in place?
Where are these phantom threads? I posted a link of YOU blaming Rand Paul for the sequester, so now its Obamas? Make up your mind?
Most conservatives thought the sequester didn't go far enough. It wasn't the Republicans projecting economic disaster by cuts in spending, it was you left wing kooks.
sequester DIDNT GO FAR ENOUGH.. I've said it before, and I'll say it again.. you can take that as blaming Obama, or not but that's the truth..
Right and then I was told that it was Obama's fault and it was Obama's sequester. What I'm having trouble understanding is if this is Obama's sequester then why does the House GOP think we should keep the sequestration spending levels in place?
The house voted for it! They thought it was a good thing. Obama didnt force them to sign it. They called his bluff.
The house voted for it! They thought it was a good thing. Obama didnt force them to sign it. They called his bluff.
But then they called it Obama's sequester, why is that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
