Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-28-2013, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,331,117 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Are we just into the fifth year? Lets compare at eight years, shall we?

For now, the most recent president that we can compare the condition of our country to, before and after, is GWB! But let me guess: "don't bring up the past."
Whenever Obama is the topic the favored response is almost always "but George W. Bush". However, the Obama supporters can't seem to cite exactly what Bush did that caused the economic crash. Please do feel free to bring up the past. Which Bush policies are you making reference to, when were they enacted, and what were the results of the Congressional vote that made them law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2013, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,753,611 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Whenever Obama is the topic the favored response is almost always "but George W. Bush". However, the Obama supporters can't seem to cite exactly what Bush did that caused the economic crash. Please do feel free to bring up the past. Which Bush policies are you making reference to, when were they enacted, and what were the results of the Congressional vote that made them law?
Simply comparing the beginning of your boy, Bushie's, term to his last day in office. Sorry you are ashamed of your man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:00 AM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,453,097 times
Reputation: 1066
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Simply comparing the beginning of your boy, Bushie's, term to his last day in office. Sorry you are ashamed of your man.
So you can't name a single policy or law that Bush is responsible for that caused anything?

Thanks for proving his point for him! :thumbup:

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,753,611 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Whenever Obama is the topic the favored response is almost always "but George W. Bush". However, the Obama supporters can't seem to cite exactly what Bush did that caused the economic crash. Please do feel free to bring up the past. Which Bush policies are you making reference to, when were they enacted, and what were the results of the Congressional vote that made them law?
This for starters:

Quote:
Republicans implemented several other conservative ideas, including lower taxes for the rich and deregulation of the financial industry. The result was a fiscal disaster.
Quote:
Instead of asking Americans to pay higher taxes to pay for the War On Terror, Bush threw away the balanced budget and choose to borrow money instead. Americans understood why taxes needed to be raised for the war effort, but Bush and the Republicans didn’t.
Quote:
Bush’s greatest mistake was gutting the military by illegally invading Iraq, instead of crushing Al Qaeda and killing or capturing Osama bin Laden. The war in Iraq stretched the military to the breaking point, shattered the budget, and divided the country in a time of war.
Report shows how Bush destroyed the American economy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,753,611 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
So you can't name a single policy or law that Bush is responsible for that caused anything?

Thanks for proving his point for him! :thumbup:

Posted with TapaTalk
Yes, I just posted a number of them. There were so many mistakes Bush made, it takes time to weed through them. Patience!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Deep Dirty South
5,190 posts, read 5,322,930 times
Reputation: 3863
Obama has certainly been a disappointment, which is what I expected. Just like every other POTUS we've had in my lifetime (which is several.)

Some good, some bad in all of them. More of one than the other in some.

The thing we really need to keep in mind here is the fact that:

The answer to a failed Democratic administration IS NOT a Republican administration.

The GOP is at least as untenable as the Dems.

Both parties suck equally when it comes to being irresponsible and incompetent with money and resources, and both parties are equally atrocious when it comes to intervening and intruding into the private lives of citizens.

More importantly, and D or R politician at the national level (or who hopes to reach nat'l level politics)--every last one of them--is bought, sold and owned by special interests.

No reasonable person should ever vote for any Democrat OR Republican for any national office ever.

As long as we do, we are selling ourselves down the river and cheering our "team" while they screw us over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,753,611 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
So you can't name a single policy or law that Bush is responsible for that caused anything?

Thanks for proving his point for him! :thumbup:

Posted with TapaTalk
Some more. Thank you for your interest.

1. Deregulated Wall Street:

2. Cut Taxes For The Wealthy:

3. Ran Up A Tab On Two Wars:

4. Left Homeowners In A Lurch:

5. Weakened Workers

5 Reasons Americans Are Right To Blame Bush For The Economy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:07 AM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,453,097 times
Reputation: 1066
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Basically telling lies.

Deregulation? Bush asked Congress 17 times to regulate Fanny & Freddie....Democrats called him a racist and said there was nothing wrong!

Raise taxes? Why? Under Bush the US Treasury saw RECORD revenues coming in.

When Clinton left office the Dot.Com bubble had already burst and Bush took over in a mini-recession. Then 911 happened and helping the economy was a priority. He invested in our economy and it took off.

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,753,611 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
Basically telling lies.

Deregulation? Bush asked Congress 17 times to regulate Fanny & Freddie....Democrats called him a racist and said there was nothing wrong!

Raise taxes? Why? Under Bush the US Treasury saw RECORD revenues coming in.

When Clinton left office the Dot.Com bubble had already burst and Bush took over in a mini-recession. Then 911 happened and helping the economy was a priority. He invested in our economy and it took off.

Posted with TapaTalk
Really? Check out Bush talk at about 4:00 minute time.


Home Ownership and President Bush - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 11:17 AM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,453,097 times
Reputation: 1066
It's so easy to prove Liberal lies wrong!....

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/bu...annie-mae.html

New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003



The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt -- is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates.

Continued at link.....




Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top