Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2014, 12:45 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
K-12 funding is primarily a state and local function. Feds are pretty much irrelevant
Not at all.

The Federal budget includes $85.1 billion for K-12 spending.


Source: Huffington Post

Note to moderators: all images appearing in this post have been linked via HTML text command in a legally permissible manner per the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Perfect 10 v. Amazon ruling, and as such do not constitute copyright violation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2014, 12:54 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
As long as a single penny of taxpayer money gets spent on religious schools I will be against vouchers.
Why? It's a proven fact that holy order Catholic schools educate students the best, even when SES is accounted for:
Are Private Schools Really Better? - TIME

Apparently, you prefer a dumbed-down populace, as do many Democrats. Democrats' highest percentage voter base is the least educated. That's how they win elections.




Note to moderators: all images appearing in this post have been linked via HTML text command in a legally permissible manner per the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Perfect 10 v. Amazon ruling, and as such do not constitute copyright violation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:04 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,793,565 times
Reputation: 5478
You are still misleading. That is what 12 or 13% of the amount expended om K12. And mostly with distinct targets.

Ahh at last we see how you will solve the problem. We send all the kids to order run catholic schools.

And it does not cost anything. All we do is pray together to increase the number of vocations to the holy orders by two or three orders of magnitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
IC, I see you didn't look at my link. I'm not as computer literate as you, I'll give you that. Since I can't show the picture, I'll tell it instead.

US average:

According to National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), the national total revenues in 2008 were broken down as follows:

Local government: 44%
State government: 48%
Federal government: 8%

Note: May not add up to 100% due to rounding.


As I said, that 8% includes the student lunch program.

Now for my state:

Public School Finance | CDE
You might want to take a look at this link, too:
Gifted and Talented Education | CDE

Last edited by Katarina Witt; 03-31-2014 at 01:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:17 PM
 
23,968 posts, read 15,063,270 times
Reputation: 12937
Nearly everyone complains about the DOE.

IMO, any school board in the country can say we don't want and federal funding. They could all cut their budgets 8% and do away with programs we all complain about. I tried to point it out to my ISD. If they object to the programs, just turn down the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:19 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
Nearly everyone complains about the DOE.

IMO, any school board in the country can say we don't want and federal funding. They could all cut their budgets 8% and do away with programs we all complain about. I tried to point it out to my ISD. If they object to the programs, just turn down the money.
Good point. So, why don't local school boards eschew federal requirements and choose to actually EDUCATE their students?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:21 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,793,565 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Good point. So, why don't local school boards eschew federal requirements and choose to actually EDUCATE their students?
Because federal requirements have virtually nothing to do with how schools actually educate children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Good point. So, why don't local school boards eschew federal requirements and choose to actually EDUCATE their students?
You don't get it. Much of that 8% goes to school lunches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:22 PM
 
13,943 posts, read 5,615,884 times
Reputation: 8603
Our entire public education system is designed incorrectly from the ground up, starting with it being public. All schools should be private, period. If the government has a compelling interest in educating its populace, then build libraries (or provide the Internet Age equivalent) and be done with it. No more public funded day care, no more public funded indoctrination into junior socialism, no more education bureaucracy nonsense. Make all schools private, let competition and the profit motive increase quality and lower price, and let people be free to become as smart or as dumb as they like.

Then, if you have kids and want them educated, go ahead and get that done any way you like, it's your freaking dime. The atheist is no longer supporting the parochial school, the libertarian is no longer supporting socialist indoctrination, the hippie is no longer forced to have Moonbeam Jr learning fascist things like math and science, and the religious zealot no longer has to have their little angel learning blasphemy about the Big Bang and evolution. Find a school, tutor or library that serves your education needs, and pony up your own cash to have that education go however you want.

Under that model, nobody is losing any 1st Amendment protected rights, and I bet our education is better all the way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
The constitution of EVERY state guarantees a free public education to each child, though in slightly different language.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...63808443,d.aWc
**Today, every state constitution contains an education provision. **
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top