Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2013, 08:29 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,477,951 times
Reputation: 16962

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Oh yes all those Iranian terrorists our number one concern, not Saudi Arabia, not Yemen, Not Pakistan but Iran LOL
And just who do you think it is that was funneling money into all of those other countries to destabilize them? Yep, your hero Iran ~ LOL.

More on your idol Rouhani.

Scroll down to "after the war" and read how he crushed the rising student rebellions against the authoritarians in power, then read his "nuclear dossier".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassan_Rouhani

Yepper's, this guy is a moderate alrighty!

Israel is but an annoying bug to be crushed on his path to get at his real enemy who installed the puppet Shah and facillitated the targeting of his family by the dreaded Savak. That would be you guys, Goodnight.

Last edited by BruSan; 10-01-2013 at 08:42 PM..

 
Old 10-01-2013, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Towner View Post
In case you don't remember, a bunch of nut jobs sanctioned by the Islamic Republic of Iran took our embassy hostage. If someone wants to cater to that government, I must ask if they are insane.
In case you don't remember....and obviously you don't....Ambassador Smith had been engaging in talks with Khomeini for nearly 2 years prior to the Shah's abdication.

I'm guessing you're not aware the Shah had pancreatic cancer, intended to abdicate, and was seeking visas for his family and himself to go the US. Both the Shah and Smith agreed that Khomeini would be the most likely successor, and in order to insure a smooth transition of power, Smith opened up a dialogue with Khomeini, enlisting the aid of the Brits and their people in Kuwait to function as go-betweens.

Smith and Khomeini were only weeks away from a face-to-face meeting to go over the details when the French DGSE (their equivalent of the CIA) blew the thing wide open.

The French were paying attention to all the running around (Khomeini was in exile in Paris) and having figured out what the US was doing, the French decided to try and put their man in power (if I remember that was Ayatollah Ruhollah).

The French spilled the beans at a meeting held at a mosque in Tabriz.

Within hours, all of the ayatollahs were rallying supporters and jockeying for position to lead Iran.

That, was the so-called "revolution."

The only thing Carter had to do was keep his mouth shut and roll out the red-carpet for Khomeini.

Khomeini then assumes power as an ally of the US, and not as an enemy.

Instead, the neo-cons on Carter's White House Staff --- Gary Sick and that jackass
Brzezinski -- talked Carter into sending General Huygens to Iran to help the Iranian military take over in a military coup.

Put yourself in Khomeini's place for just one second.....

You've been talking to the US for nearly 2 years, and now the US is silent, General Huygens is there, and the Iranian army is deployed.

....if you ain't thinking assassination, then you're not smart enough to lead a Brownie Troop across the street without getting half of them killed and the other half raped.

Under the circumstances, Khomeini acted reasonably.

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Towner View Post
Take your bleeding heart argument somewhere else. Criminal thugs sanctioned by that government did great wrong and it's a shame Tehran wasn't carpet bombed back into the stone age.
Actually, they did not.

During a speech at the University of Tehran, Khomeini told the students of the US treachery I just told you about.

That's what incited the students.

As a matter of law, the United States forfeited all legal protections under the Treaty of Vienna when the US violated the terms of the Treaty by using US Embassy Mission Tehran as a military base.

Among the captured documents, were all of the Iranians the US had murdered in cold blood for attempting to exercise Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, Freedom to Peaceably Assemble and numerous other rights you have, but that were denied to Iranians during the Shah's 26 Year Reign-O'-Terror.

Also of course, were the complete set of documents spelling out the repeated attempts by the US to murder Prime Minister Mossadeq in cold blood.

Clinton gave a half-fast semi-formal apology to the Iranian people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Jones View Post
And there is an invisible dragon that lives in my garage. Prove it doesn't exist.

I really hope Israel does attack Iran.
Well, they can't, and only a nutter claiming to have an invisible dragon living in their garage would say something so silly.

Israel cannot attack Iran, for the same reason Iran cannot attack Israel.

Use the Search Function.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
The Anti Israel nut balls have their panties in a bunch once again.
Are you referring to yourself?


Why don't you enlighten us with a display of your acumen and tell us what kind of nuclear weapons Iran is supposedly making.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
What we know is that Iran is at a point in their nuclear program that if they choose to construct the bomb, they can do so in a matter of months with primary protection 90 meters below ground imbedded in a mountain.
Without any infrastructure, not that you'd actually know what the infrastructure for nuclear or chemical weapons would actually look like.

So, what kind of "bomb" could Iran build?

Also, can you explain why your claim contradicts the IAEA report?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
When the Americans (Bush) had cold feet about destroying nuclear facilities, Israel had the balls to destroy the nuclear reactors of Iraq and Syria. And thanks to Israel, we do not have to worry about them anymore.

Every other discussion is off topic, wrong and red herrings galore.
Uh, what kind of nonsense are you talking about?

First, the French built the nuclear reactor at the behest of the Iraqis, so you're wrong on that.

Second, the attack was in 1981.....Reagan was president, not Bush, so you're wrong on that.

Third, Israel was able to carry out the attack only with extensive support and help from the US, including satellite imagery. Additionally, US military advisors in Iraq had ensured that all the radars in the area were either looking at the Iranian border, or down for maintenance.

That's how Israel was able to fly in undetected.

So, you're wrong on that.

Fourth, Syria never had nuclear reactors, so you're wrong on that.

Fifth, Israel was able to attack Syria only with massive assistance from the US, including diplomatic assistance in clearing a flight-path through Iraq, and through Turkey into Syria.

For your information, that was a missile assembly facility for air defense missiles recently purchased from Russia.

The blast break would be the first freaking clue, but then you'd have to know what you're talking about to figure that out. Surely, you can find in the photos, right?

My advice to you would be to sit out future discussions of things military as they relate to the Middle East.

Not amused...

Mircea
 
Old 10-02-2013, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
When a country (Iran) expresses genocide to another UN country ( Israel), Israel will take this seriously. When the Americans (Bush) had cold feet about destroying nuclear facilities, Israel had the balls to destroy the nuclear reactors of Iraq and Syria. And thanks to Israel, we do not have to worry about them anymore.
We never had to worry about them in the first place, except for our unaccountable and masochistic relationship with Israel.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
The United States has various selected targets through out the middle east as a concern for national security reasons. Iran's nuclear program and its sponsorship of terrorism is one of those on the list. Don't forget this "Now Moderate" Iranian government is responsible for the death of 234 US Marines In Beirut in 1983.
That was war, not terrorism. Uniformed men in someone else's country are legitimate military targets by almost any standards.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 02:02 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,456,256 times
Reputation: 3563
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
That was war, not terrorism. Uniformed men in someone else's country are legitimate military targets by almost any standards.
Whose country? I don't remember uniformed US troops in Iran in 1983...
And BTW, how Hisbullah become Lebanon's army?
 
Old 10-02-2013, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1 View Post
Whose country? I don't remember uniformed US troops in Iran in 1983...
And BTW, how Hisbullah become Lebanon's army?
Hezbollah, a Lebanese resistance group, was attacking uniformed foreign soldiers in Lebanon. That's war.

That Iran took a particular side in that war has nothing to do with anything.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 02:53 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,456,256 times
Reputation: 3563
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Hezbollah, a Lebanese resistance group, was attacking uniformed foreign soldiers in Lebanon. That's war.

That Iran took a particular side in that war has nothing to do with anything.
Iran = Hisbullah.
Without Iran there would have been no such organization. BTW, how did they posses truckloads of explosives, if not Iran/Syria? It wasn't a war of Lebanon (whose national army wasn't engaged) against foreigner armies, but something else.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 03:08 PM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,175,484 times
Reputation: 2375
Israel is the only honest broker in the Middle East and while I wish we were not giving them 4 billion a year I do not trust any other country over there.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,090,492 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Uh, what kind of nonsense are you talking about?

First, the French built the nuclear reactor at the behest of the Iraqis, so you're wrong on that.
Point being?

Quote:
Second, the attack was in 1981.....Reagan was president, not Bush, so you're wrong on that.
You're right, my mistake. But proves my further point that the US never had the cajonies to prevent any program from going nuclear.

Quote:
Third, Israel was able to carry out the attack only with extensive support and help from the US, including satellite imagery. Additionally, US military advisors in Iraq had ensured that all the radars in the area were either looking at the Iranian border, or down for maintenance.

That's how Israel was able to fly in undetected.

So, you're wrong on that.
Lol you sound like a tool. Anyway, There was no US assistance during the Israeli raid of the Osirak raid. United States was really upset by it and it is even said that Israel told the United States about the attack after the jets were flying back to Israel. UN Censure... F-16 embargo. Hope this clears up any confusions that you have at this point.

Quote:
Fourth, Syria never had nuclear reactors, so you're wrong on that.
Operation Orchard

Quote:
Fifth, Israel was able to attack Syria only with massive assistance from the US, including diplomatic assistance in clearing a flight-path through Iraq, and through Turkey into Syria.
So what did Israel attack if Syria had "no nuclear reactors"? You're slipping on your agenda.

Quote:
For your information, that was a missile assembly facility for air defense missiles recently purchased from Russia.

The blast break would be the first freaking clue, but then you'd have to know what you're talking about to figure that out. Surely, you can find in the photos, right?

My advice to you would be to sit out future discussions of things military as they relate to the Middle East.

Not amused...

Mircea
Instead of attempting to look cool and insulting me, you should understand the events that took place before accusing someone of bs and more bs.
 
Old 10-02-2013, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,090,492 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
That was war, not terrorism. Uniformed men in someone else's country are legitimate military targets by almost any standards.
Oh I see. It was "war". You're quit the legitimate apologetic for Hezzbollah. Should we provide some examples of Hezzbollah terrorist acts? Instead of trying to justify the murder of you're countries soldiers, you find an excuses to some how ratify some anti-Israel propaganda. But ofcourse, its the evil juice fault
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top