Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You do understand all those programs were either paid into their whole lives or paid for by service to our country... on second thought because you have done neither you probably don't understand....
Sure, they can get their benefits. Why, then, are they so militantly against every other federal program? This shut down the government because we don't like a law bs. is just beyond stupid and irresponsible. Why do the Tea Party, members of the wealthiest generation ever, insist on acting like victims? It really seems unhinged.
Harrier supports the Tea Party objectives of smaller, constitutional, limited government, funded by lower taxes which has the benefit of stimulating economic growth, and holding government responsible and accountable for its actions.
Per California state law - Harrier is a member of the unorganized militia of California and will be for at least the next 9 years.
Quote:
120. The militia of the State shall consist of the National Guard,
State Military Reserve and the Naval Militia--which constitute the
active militia--and the unorganized militia.
121. The unorganized militia consists of all persons liable to service in the militia, but not members of the National Guard, the
State Military Reserve, or the Naval Militia.
122. The militia of the State consists of all able-bodied male citizens and all other able-bodied males who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, who are between the ages of eighteen and forty-five, and who are residents of the State, and of such other persons as may upon their own application be
enlisted or commissioned therein pursuant to the provisions of this
division, subject, however, to such exemptions as now exist or may be
hereafter created by the laws of the United States or of this State.
So, if by his support of the Tea Party objectives, that makes Harrier a Tea Party member, and the fact that he is per state law a member of the unorganized militia, you could say that in Harrier's case that being simultaneously a Tea Party member and a militia member is true.
Harrier supports the Tea Party objectives of smaller, constitutional, limited government, funded by lower taxes which has the benefit of stimulating economic growth, and holding government responsible and accountable for its actions.
Per California state law - Harrier is a member of the unorganized militia of California and will be for at least the next 9 years.
So, if by his support of the Tea Party objectives, that makes Harrier a Tea Party member, and the fact that he is per state law a member of the unorganized militia, you could say that in Harrier's case that being simultaneously a Tea Party member and a militia member is true.
Perfect! And +1. I'm totally on board with this. I'm actually over the age limit for militia field service, but, what's age but a number. One does not have to be an active combatant to be of use on & I'm still capable of combat service should I be called on to do so.
The TEA party really gets under the leftists skin. They are terrified of it. It's rather amusing how they run it down as so insignificant and fringe, yet dedicate such effort to make people believe that. Sheesh, seems, according to the libby leftists, that view should sell itself, without all the rhetoric.
This government shutdown, and the militantly dumb statements I have been reading for weeks suggest that a good number of Tea Partiers have become more of an apocalyptic cult than a real political movement.
How are the Tea Partiers different from wingnuts like Randy Weaver and McVeigh? The hostility, anti-government fanaticism, obsession with guns,etc. all seems increasingly familiar.
What positive outcome do they hope to create by sewing so much strife and nastiness?
Are you still calling him King Obama? Good for you.
Harrier supports the Tea Party objectives of smaller, constitutional, limited government, funded by lower taxes which has the benefit of stimulating economic growth, and holding government responsible and accountable for its actions.
Per California state law - Harrier is a member of the unorganized militia of California and will be for at least the next 9 years.
So, if by his support of the Tea Party objectives, that makes Harrier a Tea Party member, and the fact that he is per state law a member of the unorganized militia, you could say that in Harrier's case that being simultaneously a Tea Party member and a militia member is true.
Do they perform any screening for the unorganized militia, who decides if someone can join and what are the requirements and when do they spring into action.
I think Timothy McVey was a member of the unorganized militia.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
