Obama talks about the need for new revenues (Pelosi, gasoline, Reid)

[hawkeye2009]

Originally Posted by petch751

Some information about the Obama republican meeting is starting to leak out. Obama talked about the need for new revenues. Who didn't see that coming. Obama wants to raise taxes again.

We have record revenues for 2012. We have had tax increases.

Only an idiot would conclude that we need more "revenues" rather than less spending. Are these guys that moronic?

Revenues - Spending = Surplus (or if negative, Deficits).

These imbeciles will blow any additional "revenue" that they receive and will not act responsibly. That is their history. We need Legal constraints on these spending addicts, who have equated spending to chances of re-election.


1. Congressional Balanced Budget Amendment
2 15% VAT
3. Flat income tax for EVERYONE at 20%
4. Corporate taxes at 15%
5. Raise medicare/social security eligibility to age 72
6. Permit foodstamps/medicaid/welfare for only three years of a ten year period
7. allow energy exploration on federal lands
8. enforce immigration laws
9. repeal Obamacare
10. demand the "commands" of the EPA be only authorized by congressional vote/review
11. repeal/renegotiate NAFTA and China trade policies

[Chimuelojones]

Originally Posted by petch751

Some information about the Obama republican meeting is starting to leak out. Obama talked about the need for new revenues. Who didn't see that coming. Obama wants to raise taxes again.

Why just leaks...let the person with all the information come out and detail the deal.

[Mac_Muz]

Originally Posted by Mircea

That is not a possibility during this decade, and unlikely for some time through about 2040-2060.
Mircea

In 2060 I will be 110 years old

[Chimuelojones]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

1. Congressional Balanced Budget Amendment

Rejecting the idea Congress can't control its spending impulses, the House turned back a Republican proposal Friday to amend the Constitution to dam the rising flood of federal red ink. Democrats — and a few GOP lawmakers — said damage from the balanced-budget mandate would outweigh any benefits.

Sorry bad idea with no support except from those that have the government shut down.

[Chimuelojones]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

We have record revenues for 2012. We have had tax increases.

Only an idiot would conclude that we need more "revenues" rather than less spending. Are these guys that moronic?

Revenues - Spending = Surplus (or if negative, Deficits).

These imbeciles will blow any additional "revenue" that they receive and will not act responsibly. That is their history. We need Legal constraints on these spending addicts, who have equated spending to chances of re-election.


1. Congressional Balanced Budget Amendment
2 15% VAT
3. Flat income tax for EVERYONE at 20%
4. Corporate taxes at 15%
5. Raise medicare/social security eligibility to age 72
6. Permit foodstamps/medicaid/welfare for only three years of a ten year period
7. allow energy exploration on federal lands
8. enforce immigration laws
9. repeal Obamacare
10. demand the "commands" of the EPA be only authorized by congressional vote/review
11. repeal/renegotiate NAFTA and China trade policies

You keep posting these losing proposals. they were decided in the 2012 election.
I understand conservative...but you are a regressive.

We are not going backwards.

[Tilt11]

Originally Posted by Chimuelojones

You keep posting these losing proposals. they were decided in the 2012 election.
I understand conservative...but you are a regressive.

We are not going backwards.

LOL What is your idea of going forward? The direction we're heading? Do you people really even think about what you say? Do you think about what it is you supposedly believe?

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by Chimuelojones

You keep posting these losing proposals. they were decided in the 2012 election.
I understand conservative...but you are a regressive.

We are not going backwards.

We've been going backwards ever since Obama was first elected. How's the hopey, changy thing working out for you guys?

[Chimuelojones]

Originally Posted by Tilt11

LOL What is your idea of going forward? The direction we're heading? Do you people really even think about what you say? Do you think about what it is you supposedly believe?

Old tire and rejected republican proposeals from the last election cycle are backward thinking...Dont tell me you are for those loser proposals?

[Chimuelojones]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

We've been going backwards ever since Obama was first elected. How's the hopey, changy thing working out for you guys?

Just fine...its not working for you I can tell.

[Chimuelojones]

hey tilt where are those Obama revenue increases you were gonna prove are comming...