Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2013, 11:54 AM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,813,989 times
Reputation: 1549

Advertisements

California's governor shows his true colors.

'California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) Saturday vetoed a bill that would have allowed prosecutors or judges to charge simple drug possession as a misdemeanor instead of a felony.

Some 10,000 people are convicted of drug possession felonies each year in California, and experts estimated that, under the bill, 15% to 30% of them would have been charged instead with misdemeanors.

The exact number is unknown because the bill would have left those decisions up to prosecutors and judges.

But in any case, the bill would have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in criminal justice system savings, which would have provided local governments with more flexibility to invest in drug treatment and mental health services and focus law enforcement resources on more serious offenses, along with lightening up on some of the people caught up in the criminal justice system.

The bill, Senate Bill 649, was sponsored by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and passed the legislature with bipartisan support, but was opposed by law enforcement and some prosecutors. Leno and supporters had argued that the bill would save the state money on incarceration and related costs.'

Jerry Brown Vetoes California "Defelonization" Bill - informationliberation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2013, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,017,688 times
Reputation: 6128
Don't blame Harrier - he voted for Meg Whitman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
310 posts, read 256,450 times
Reputation: 124
What a wimp, just like how he signed the hemp bill but will only allow it if his daddy (the feds) allow it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 01:09 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
I think Jerry Brown has decided that this time he's just going to see how many people he can **** off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,175,972 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
California's governor shows his true colors.

'California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) Saturday vetoed a bill that would have allowed prosecutors or judges to charge simple drug possession as a misdemeanor instead of a felony.

Some 10,000 people are convicted of drug possession felonies each year in California, and experts estimated that, under the bill, 15% to 30% of them would have been charged instead with misdemeanors.

The exact number is unknown because the bill would have left those decisions up to prosecutors and judges.

But in any case, the bill would have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in criminal justice system savings, which would have provided local governments with more flexibility to invest in drug treatment and mental health services and focus law enforcement resources on more serious offenses, along with lightening up on some of the people caught up in the criminal justice system.

The bill, Senate Bill 649, was sponsored by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and passed the legislature with bipartisan support, but was opposed by law enforcement and some prosecutors. Leno and supporters had argued that the bill would save the state money on incarceration and related costs.'

Jerry Brown Vetoes California "Defelonization" Bill - informationliberation

Illegal drug possession should be a CAPITAL offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,485,034 times
Reputation: 4185
I don't agree with Gov. Brown, but his justification is that they are having a sentencing restructuring in the near future anyway.

It's not only drug sentences that ought to be reconsidered. The guy doing 15-to-life for sucking on boys' toes ought to cause California to reconsider some of its sex laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Idaho
6,358 posts, read 7,773,028 times
Reputation: 14188
It's easy. Just stay away from illegal drugs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,481,895 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by volosong View Post
It's easy. Just stay away from illegal drugs.
I still would have to pay the bill to apprehend, prosecute, and incarcerate the offenders. Next the government will tell us to "Just say, "No,""

[oh...wait...what a charade]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 05:13 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,813,989 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
I don't agree with Gov. Brown, but his justification is that they are having a sentencing restructuring in the near future anyway.

It's not only drug sentences that ought to be reconsidered. The guy doing 15-to-life for sucking on boys' toes ought to cause California to reconsider some of its sex laws.
Wow, that's pretty gross, but 15 to life? That's worse than the Az realtor doing 10 years for cursing a cop. Well, maybe the gov will pardon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2013, 07:47 PM
 
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,736,880 times
Reputation: 20050
Quote:
Originally Posted by volosong View Post
It's easy. Just stay away from illegal drugs.

ya why do illegal drugs when you can drink and get obliterated on all the alcoholic beverages and prescription poisons one can digest


I would rather smoke weed than do the above
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top