Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is Jimmy Carter THE worst president in US history?
Yes, he is the absolute worst! 52 27.96%
No, he was the best! (or good or whatever - state below) 106 56.99%
I do not know. 28 15.05%
Voters: 186. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2016, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Houston TX
269 posts, read 178,470 times
Reputation: 323

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Being impeached keeps Clinton well away from the "great" category.
Clinton wasn't impeached. That's just a word you like to throw around because you have no idea what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2016, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,790,545 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by carolinajack View Post
a better statesmen until recently, Carter was and still is the worst we have ever had.
He has become the 3rd worst, with Wilson being THE worst for allowing the FRB to be created America's Worst President Ever | The National Interest and our current and last president, and Nixon rounding out the top 5 worst.

I miss Reagan and Slick Willy. I fear Slick Wifey though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 03:09 PM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,384,859 times
Reputation: 10259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talkinhead View Post
Clinton wasn't impeached. That's just a word you like to throw around because you have no idea what you're talking about.
LOL


In fact Mr. Clinton was impeached. Impeachment is a process in the House that brings charges. That is impeachment.


Then a trial is held in the Senate. Mr. Clinton was impeached but was not removed from office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 03:10 PM
 
8,079 posts, read 10,081,779 times
Reputation: 22670
In my time, Jimmy looks like a star compared to Reagan or Bush the second.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 03:19 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,955,882 times
Reputation: 8114
Yes! Without a doubt, and Obummer is not far behind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 03:21 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,555,388 times
Reputation: 4471
he wasn't the worst, but he was the weakest, IMO.

444 days of Iran holding Americans hostage says Carter was WEAK!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 06:28 PM
 
Location: Iowa
3,320 posts, read 4,131,452 times
Reputation: 4616
Well, let's face it, for modern presidents it's either Carter or Dubya, I have to give it to Carter because Dubya got a second term. The Failings under Dubya were not readily apparent to the public or to Dubya himself. There was a prevailing feeling among the US public that Saddam should have been taken out in Desert Storm, and that invading Iraq might be worthwhile in making the region safer. Who knew that the new Iraq president would be a dip stick, that the new Iraq army would cowardly retreat from Mosul and give it to ISIS, that Iran would move in and steal oil wells, ect ect. Also with the housing crash, who would have known (besides that one woman in the SEC that everyone laughed at) that repealing Glass Steagall would open up a whole rat's nest of crooked banking and investment practices, eventually causing the housing crisis. Liberals and conservatives together voted to kill Glass Steagall. That blame falls wide, not just Dubya.

Dubya was providing leadership, or the illusion of having some type of plan and coarse of action to take, the surge was temporarily working to stabilize Iraq, when he left office the fighting in Iraq was subdued. It was up to the next administration to decide the important question of how many troops to leave in Iraq and for how long. Even with Iraq fragmented, one of the underlying goals of the Iraq war was accomplished, in that Iraq went back on the petrodollar system of selling oil in US dollars, from a US perspective that is a major goal achieved by Dubya, and it still remains intact today. And Iraq's government is still there, weak but not yet finished.

Carter the peanut farmer trashed the farm economy with his grain embargo. His leadership was very weak, the national economy (on the surface) was much worse under Carter than GW. We had double digit inflation, high interest rates, high unemployment, I remember all of that very well. There was no hope under Carter, and Reagan brought relief for most of the nation (but not farm and manufacturing).

The real heir to the throne of Iran, a standup guy for democracy and best hope for Iran, Reza Pahlavi, son of the old Shah of Iran, resides here in the US instead of in Iran where he belongs, thanks to Carter's weakness. Also for those that think Obama was the worst, I haven't seen a stronger farm economy than what we've had under Obama, since the days of Richard The Great. For Iowa, the '08 recession was just a blip compared to much of the country, and his alternative (wind) energy policy has been helpful to our state, and much of the Midwest/Plains, and oil states like Texas never had much of a recession either until the recent oil crash. Remember when Obama went into his car salesman pitch after the GM bailout? Cash for clunkers was still better than the stuff Carter did (nothing).

Last edited by mofford; 01-21-2016 at 06:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Near Falls Lake
4,254 posts, read 3,176,299 times
Reputation: 4701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Bear View Post
In my time, Jimmy looks like a star compared to Reagan or Bush the second.
Seriously??? I take it you don't remember the "misery index."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 09:56 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,955,882 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Bear View Post
In my time, Jimmy looks like a star compared to Reagan or Bush the second.



Hahahaha. LMAO!!! Surely you jest. Carter was a frigging joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
2,232 posts, read 2,119,937 times
Reputation: 1910
Who wants to talk about Jimmy carter job creation record?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top