Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz
No doubt that Clinton looks good as prez in retrospect,....
|
What?
Why? Because he gave not one --- but two --- plutonium producing nuclear reactors to North Korea?
I'm just not getting how empowering a tiny ****-ant nation-State like North Korea to threaten the world with nuclear weapons is "looking good."
Because of the Iran-Kosovo Scandal?
How does illegally buying weapons from Iran in violation of US Public Law and various UN Security Council edicts and giving them to al-Zawahiri of al-Qaida to be smuggled from Albania into Bosnia and Kosovo make Clinton look good?
By illegally over-throwing 9 governments?
Hell, by that standard, Obama is a terrible president, since he's only illegally over-thrown the governments of Honduras and Libya.
How about violating US Public Law to negotiate with the Taliban?
Enron?
Yeah, Enron collapsed during the Bush Administration, but that's because Clinton and Bush were unable to tame the Taliban and get the CentGas Pipeline run through Afghanistan into Pakistan into India.....where Enron had invested $Billions in natural gas processing and refining facilities, causing Enron to go heavily into debt and having nothing to show for it.
How about War Crimes in the Balkans?
Clinton makes Millard Fillmore look great.
Retrospectively....
Mircea