Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2013, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,809,001 times
Reputation: 7168

Advertisements

For whatever reason, the size of the United States House of Representatives was frozen at 435 by the Reapportionment Act of 1929. The population of the nation has grown a lot since then. Would having a larger number of Representatives be a good idea? Why or why not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2013, 03:13 PM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,031,817 times
Reputation: 525
What difference would it make? Do you think they'd listen to the people they represent (the real constituents) any better if there were more of them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,480,601 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfman View Post
What difference would it make? Do you think they'd listen to the people they represent (the real constituents) any better if there were more of them?
Actually, that's possible. With more representatives, there would conceivably be fewer constituents per Rep., making it more possible to be heard, and more possible for representatives to listen.

Although, having too many representatives would be pretty unwieldy. Then again, The House of Commons manages with over 600 members in a country of only 63 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,365,472 times
Reputation: 2922
The corporations and banksters would be against this idea they would have to grease more palms on both sides of the aisle. It will never happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,906,557 times
Reputation: 3497
Yes, this would have the effect of shrinking legislative districts bringing Congresspeople closer to their constituents, which is the whole point of that House. Also the smaller each district becomes the harder it is to gerrymander them helping to solve that problem as well.

Lastly, it solves the problem of unequal vote value where a vote in a rural state is worth much more than the vote in an urban state. The idea of one man, one vote, and all votes being worth the same is exactly what we should be attempting to achieve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,906,557 times
Reputation: 3497
It would certainly help to reduce partisan dysfunction in the house too as there would be more reps and with smaller districts there is less room for gerrymandering. As an added benefit more regular people could be elected because having smaller districts means regular folks could actually campaign door to door where as in the giant mega districts in the urban states you have to have deep pockets to buy media air time as it is impractical to have one man knock on hundreds of thousands of doors. Heck, people might actually even live in the same neighborhood as their rep or even know who he is. That would be great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 04:06 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,002 times
Reputation: 2177
The notion that we can get accountability on the part of a 435, much less 800 or 2000 or 5000 member committee is just plain silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 04:51 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,837,332 times
Reputation: 20030
isnt our current congress corrupt enough? do we really need more people to add to the corruption?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 05:54 PM
 
1,806 posts, read 1,737,489 times
Reputation: 988
Unfortunately, the congressional districts were juryrigged by state politicians to make seats untouchable. That's why with a ~10% approval rate you have ~90% of incumbents winning. That's what needs to be fixed. More seats won't help.

I'm sure you guys don't realize it, but that's the cause of the complaints above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 06:13 PM
 
45,230 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24979
The last thing we need is a few more democrats and republicans to tell us how to live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top