Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seriously? Your core accusation is that evolutionist scientists are liars, and that all evidence for evolution is a lie. You were falsely calling Nebraska Man a "lie" just a couple of posts ago.
Again, I have not called anyone a liar. I think they believe in a lie, but that does not mean they are liars. You accused me, I did not accuse you. All personal attacks come from your camp.
Quote:
No. They (if by "they" you mean scientists) never tried to "sell" it as anything
I guess you don't mean that selling your theory means.
Quote:
And that one was a hoax (though not "another hoax" as it stands
quite distinctly alone), which yet again was corrected by scientists... not by
creationists.
But Java Man is not a hoax. Neither are the
tens of thousand of other fossil hominids that have been discovered and that
demonstrate in detail the evolution of human beings from our apelike
ancestors.
LOL. Give it time, and they all turn out to be something completely different that you have been told all these years. Java man was human. Pygmies are humans too, not missing links.
Yes, you did. You called Dr. Henry Fairfield Osborn a liar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
I think they believe in a lie, but that does not mean they are liars.
See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
You accused me, I did not accuse you.
Again... and it is odd I have to make this point twice... how you have behaved has nothing to do with how you have accused anybody else of behaving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
All personal attacks come from your camp.
Since I am in Dr. Osborn's camp and you are not, that has been proved untrue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
I guess you don't mean that selling your theory means.
That's not even a sentence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
Give it time, and they all turn out to be something completely different that you have been told all these years.
Wrong. You have two examples, one a hoax, one a trivial and quickly corrected mistake regarding an obscure tooth that nobody except creationists have cared about for a century.
I have tens of thousands of examples of fossils that remain exactly what we understood them to be right out of the gate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
Java man was human. Pygmies are humans too, not missing links.
Java man was human, but he was not Homo sapiens. And your comment regarding pygmies has a ring a racism around it.
Again, I have not called anyone a liar. I think they believe in a lie, but that does not mean they are liars. You accused me, I did not accuse you. All personal attacks come from your camp.
Well, you could start telling the truth.
11-12-2013, 07:21 PM
2K5Gx2km
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
Scientists are so desparate to prove evolution that they invent the missing links.
Thesre is no 'missing link' - there are however transitions.
Thesre is no 'missing link' - there are however transitions.
Did scientists invent this evidence?
I wouldn't say they are all invented with the purpose of misleading people, because most of them have been honest mistakes, while some have been deliberate attempts to mislead. Earlier in this thread I gave examples of both intentional and unintentional inventions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.