Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:03 AM
 
Location: The High Plains
525 posts, read 508,545 times
Reputation: 244

Advertisements

This article highlights the fundamental, innate issues that Obamacare has. The website problems are irrelevant. You could find a few 12 years olds on the street and they could eventually fix the website. The real meat and potatoes of this problem are fundamentally entrenched in the design of the law itself. Please take time to read this article and provide some throughtful feedback. It really does hit on one of the biggest issues with Obamacare and I believe that even supporters will have to acknowledge that the issues cited are fundamental problems.--------------------Here is a quote from the article, "It is also ironic that high-deductible, catastrophic plans are precisely what young people should be buying in the first place. They are inexpensive because they provide coverage for unlikely, but expensive, events. Routine care is best paid for out-of-pocket by value conscious consumers. But Obamacare outlaws these plans, in favor of what amounts to prepaid medical treatment that shifts the cost of services to taxpayers. In such a system, patients have no incentive to contain costs. Since the biggest factor driving health care costs higher in the first place has been the over use of insurance that results from government-provided tax incentives, and the lack of cost accountability that results from a third-party payer system, Obamacare will bend the cost curve even higher. The fact that Obamacare does nothing to rein in costs while providing an open-ended insurance subsidy may be good news for hospitals and insurance companies, but it's bad news for taxpayers, on whom this increased burden will ultimately fall." -Peter Schiff ----- RealClearMarkets - The Website Is Fixable, But Obamacare Isn't
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:16 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,542,326 times
Reputation: 6392
Dems will soon be denying they had anything to do with Obamacare. Even O himself will do this. It's what leftists do when their abject stupidity and corruption are so exposed even they can see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
744 posts, read 1,091,433 times
Reputation: 871
In 20 years, Republicans will be running for office promising to strengthen or improve Obamacare.

And you know it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,173,239 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Dems will soon be denying they had anything to do with Obamacare. Even O himself will do this. It's what leftists do when their abject stupidity and corruption are so exposed even they can see it.
They will claim this was the best they could do with all the GOP obstuction eventhough not one Republican even voted for this garbage. This is what happens when there is one-party rule in government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:19 AM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,096 posts, read 19,703,590 times
Reputation: 25612
We already knew this before Obamacare was passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2013, 11:50 AM
 
Location: The High Plains
525 posts, read 508,545 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
We already knew this before Obamacare was passed.
Exactly. But it needs to be reiterated and acknowledged by the laws supporters. The GOP gave them every opportunity to drop this garbage law...but they've refused time and time again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2013, 01:25 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
So your objection is it places the cost burdens of the old over the entire population. Ignoring the fact that while younger people may be slightly impacted, that over time they will benefit from it? Basically its a health care investment. And that people with extreme incomes will cover for some of the people with low incomes. All the while saying "most millionaires started from nothing" and not seeing that this means that when they were poor and getting a subsidy it helped them..... Sometimes the discussions are just a bit surreal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top