Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:22 PM
 
389 posts, read 617,197 times
Reputation: 203

Advertisements

Now the wheels of law making are no longer seized...
Quote:
Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) filed a bill on Tuesday that would amend the Constitution and impose term limits on members of Congress.
The measure would call for a maximum of 24 years of service for lawmakers, with 12 years each in both the House and Senate.
House GOP bill pushes term limits | TheHill

Wouldn't this be nice, having representatives focus on their constituents at least two of those twelve years? It's a start, for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,645 posts, read 26,393,631 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by SETI_listener View Post
Now the wheels of law making are no longer seized...

House GOP bill pushes term limits | TheHill

Wouldn't this be nice, having representatives focus on their constituents at least two of those twelve years? It's a start, for sure.

That's too long.

Three terms in the house or two in the senate is plenty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by SETI_listener View Post
Now the wheels of law making are no longer seized...

House GOP bill pushes term limits | TheHill

Wouldn't this be nice, having representatives focus on their constituents at least two of those twelve years? It's a start, for sure.
24 years...... That's way too long. 8 years max.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:39 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,672,444 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
24 years...... That's way too long. 8 years max.
I'm guessing the idea is that you have to start somewhere.

I would support it. But I doubt it would get any support at all in the Senate, because half of those windbags have made their life's work in that place.

More importantly, I would very strongly support an amendment limiting number of years as a SCOTUS justice -- like 10 maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,794,097 times
Reputation: 2587
Does anyone believe that 2/3 of both houses plus 3/4 of the state legislatures would vote this way?

Remember that the 1994 congress tried just such an amendment and it withered away like roses in the summer heat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:50 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,604,595 times
Reputation: 3881
Didn't take the GOP long to start handing legislative thank-yous to their lobbyist buddies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
That's too long.

Three terms in the house or two in the senate is plenty.
I agree and they should also do away with the lifetime pension and lifetime healthcare unless they want to give it to the rest of us as well....I really doubt any term limit bill will pass regardless of how easy on politicians that it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:54 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMiller View Post
Didn't take the GOP long to start handing legislative thank-yous to their lobbyist buddies.
In what way is this a thank you to their lobbyist buddies? I'd think the opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:57 PM
 
389 posts, read 617,197 times
Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMiller View Post
Didn't take the GOP long to start handing legislative thank-yous to their lobbyist buddies.
You must mean lobbyist as in the people who voted. I don't think the scumbag version of lobbyists would like having less senior members and more diversity and turnover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,761,687 times
Reputation: 15482
My current (republican) state representative was first elected in 1995, running on the contract with america, and he promised to abide by its term limits provision (two terms, IIRC).

He's very cozy right where he is, thank you very much.

This bill will disappear, leaving little trace behind it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top