LAX shooter a registered Democrat. (work, liberals, conservative, difference)

[hothulamaui]

at twenty some odd years of age the shooter didn't have much understanding politics. so little in fact it isn't worth much at all when discussing this tragedy.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by jmqueen

Bwahahahaha. I don't think "solutions" means what you think it means.

Tell me, how exactly do you propose to actually force people to do what you tell them to? Hint: You can't. Again, your platitudes are not solutions, just words.

Let me know when you head out into the mean streets to force all those poor people to do as you tell them. Then we'll talk.

You probably didn't intend to do so, but you just clearly articulated the mindset of a liberal.

Liberals see solutions in terms of how the government can force people to do things against their will, or in how much money they can confiscate at gunpoint to redistribute.

Liberals(and their political party - the Democrat Party) are all about control, coercion, and forcing blind obedience. They are against liberty, responsibility, and free choice.

The solution that the person to whom you responded gave are implemented by free people making decisions according to their own will.

No force is needed, but it is very interesting(and telling) that you rejected them as solutions just because the government wasn't involved.

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by pnwmdk

That's strange... Because SOLVING these problems revolves around...

Keeping their legs closed
Making better choices
Working harder
Planning better
Acting smarter
Being more ambitious in your outlook

Those ARE the solutions. They are all individual actions and choices that when combined chart the course of a person's life. This is absolutely inescapable. What's more informative, is that you criticize people for advocating the actual solutions.

Note "evil thy name is woman" is at the top of the list.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by pch1013

Ed should be aware that Harrier had no factual basis for his statement, which makes it -- what's the word? -- oh yeah, A LIE.

Harrier's statement was that the man was reportedly a registered Democrat, and Harrier also used the qualifier "if", which does not make it a definite statement.

So Harrier told the truth - and that truth is disputed by no one.

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Harrier's statement was that the man was reportedly a registered Democrat, and Harrier also used the qualifier "if", which does not make it a definite statement.

So Harrier told the truth - and that truth is disputed by no one.

Harrier's thread title is this: LAX shooter a registered Democrat.

Where is the qualifier?

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Harrier's statement was that the man was reportedly a registered Democrat, and Harrier also used the qualifier "if", which does not make it a definite statement.

So Harrier told the truth - and that truth is disputed by no one.

However, Harrier lied in his thread title, which is " LAX shooter a registered Democrat."

[lvoc]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Harrier's statement was that the man was reportedly a registered Democrat, and Harrier also used the qualifier "if", which does not make it a definite statement.

So Harrier told the truth - and that truth is disputed by no one.

Harrier's headline is not a conditional. Harrier's headline was not true.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Katiana

However, Harrier lied in his thread title, which is " LAX shooter a registered Democrat."

How is that a lie?

Do you have evidence that proves that he isn't?

The title simply reports what was reported.

Harrier made it clear that this was "not yet a verified fact" - which is much different from being "not true", by the way.

Admit it, you wouldn't be saying that it was a lie had the title been "LAX shooter is a Tea Party member".

The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate left wing hypocrisy.

As someone said above - mission accomplished.

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by Harrier

How is that a lie?

Do you have evidence that proves that he isn't?

The title simply reports what was reported.

Harrier made it clear that this was not yet a verified fact.

Admit it, you wouldn't be saying that it was a lie had the title been "LAX shooter is a Tea Party member".

The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate left wing hypocrisy.

As someone said above - mission accomplished.

You accomplished nothing but a lie. Good work, conservative.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by lvoc

Harrier's headline is not a conditional. Harrier's headline was not true.

How do you know?

What is his voting registration information?

All the title does is state what was reported.

You are making a definite statement that it is not true.

Prove it.