Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1. Well, considering that the U.S. Supreme Court previously had 8-1 rulings/decisions such as Buck v. Bell (1927), I wouldn't be too surprised by this.
2. Not if these individuals want to reproduce naturally. Also, this was a reponse to the genetic disorders part, and I don't think that it would apply to my point about pregnant women who want to give birth to defective children rather than to get abortions.
1. I'm not familiar with Buck v Bell, but our understanding of genetic disorders, and their causes has come a long way since 1927.
2. I may be getting tired, but I'm not getting your point. Genetic study has shown that chances of genetic abnormalities from closely related parents is not much higher than the chances of genetic abnormalities for a 45 year old woman having a child. The government shouldn't be involved in either of their choice to, or not to, reproduce.
So Federal Gay Marriage is legal? Why all the fuss with State decisions?
Because people get married and live in states. Those states may not recognize their marriage, thus no equal protection under the law. States have to follow the constitution too. The case heard did not involve state recognition, but there will be one before the court in the next couple of years.
1. I'm not familiar with Buck v Bell, but our understanding of genetic disorders, and their causes has come a long way since 1927.
2. I may be getting tired, but I'm not getting your point. Genetic study has shown that chances of genetic abnormalities from closely related parents is not much higher than the chances of genetic abnormalities for a 45 year old woman having a child. The government shouldn't be involved in either of their choice to, or not to, reproduce.
The gov't shouldn't be involved in 99% of what it does.
In fact SSM would not even be an issue, if there were no Income Taxes, the right to contract (true rights), and common law courts.
Marriage is none of the Gov't biz.. neither is education, medicine, welfare, commerce, land use, self protection, end of life, birth, vaccinations, subsidies, energy... etc....
Because people get married and live in states. Those states may not recognize their marriage, thus no equal protection under the law. States have to follow the constitution too. The case heard did not involve state recognition, but there will be one before the court in the next couple of years.
Wouldn't doubt it. Politicians needed time to get their talking points in order.
The gov't shouldn't be involved in 99% of what it does.
In fact SSM would not even be an issue, if there were no Income Taxes, the right to contract (true rights), and common law courts.
Marriage is none of the Gov't biz.. neither is education, medicine, welfare, commerce, land use, self protection, end of life, birth, vaccinations, subsidies, energy... etc....
Should all be private and without encroachment.
You get right on that. I'll keep fighting for what is the actual law, and you keep wishing.
Considering that you don't even vote, how do you propose to change anything?
No kidding. And i am pleased it does. Theocracies are not pleasant.
As well, it doesn't (Yet) Limit my choice to believe. Nor the right of the Creator to have the final say.
This existence is called temporal for a reason... it's temporary, and everyone gets graded.
You have no proof of your creator, thus your creator does not have any final say. Temporal and temporary do not mean the same thing, totally different meanings, not even related. Look it up. Your choice to believe ends where my choice to not follow your religion begins, keep your religion to yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.