Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2013, 02:44 PM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,268,656 times
Reputation: 11907

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Per the charity website, they pay out over 82% of donations directly to research etc. which is fairly high for a charity.

Regardless of how you feel about their political misstep or the pay of their CEO, that's pretty decent.

Every big organization has some negative aspects so maybe go a little easy before completely condemning one of them.
Komen has always had a pretty good reputation for their percentage payout to research and etc. - the problem was that they cut their "payout" to Planned Parenthood. They didn't have permission to do that - PP has the absolute RIGHT to determine who the Komen Foundation gives their grants to.

Planned Parenthood and their Abortion machine had a RIGHT to that money - so Komen had to be 'taught a lesson'. Hopefully, a lesson that other Charity Organizations would remember and take to heart. Thou Must not Offend PP and their supporters. PP is to be congratulated for their success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:20 PM
 
2,538 posts, read 4,711,827 times
Reputation: 3356
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
How is that a problem?
Really, you have to ask that? It's the fox guarding the hen house. This is the reason CEO pay has been skyrocketing for the last two decades. The board is simply a rubber stamp because they all belong the same club.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 12:08 AM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,227,349 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Jones View Post
Really, you have to ask that? It's the fox guarding the hen house. This is the reason CEO pay has been skyrocketing for the last two decades. The board is simply a rubber stamp because they all belong the same club.
What's wrong with clubs?

Friends can hire and promote friends, right?

Besides, it's the board that's in charge, not low wage workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 04:38 AM
 
147 posts, read 130,169 times
Reputation: 58
I honestly think that the more we continue to fund this type of "charity," the less motivation they have to find a cure. If they "find the cure" the money will stop rolling in. Women are suckers if they think that by buying a stupid pink t shirt or key chain, they are any closer to a cure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 04:41 AM
 
2,538 posts, read 4,711,827 times
Reputation: 3356
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
What's wrong with clubs?

Friends can hire and promote friends, right?

Besides, it's the board that's in charge, not low wage workers.
Are you serious? The board of directors is suppose to be an independent overseer of the company, not a rubber stamp for their buddies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 06:34 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Pretty small pay compared to most CEOs of huge organizations. Does the OP have issues with charities? This is the second thread the OP has railed about a charity.
lol what?

being critical of one highly-controversial organization makes a person "anti-charity" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,024,526 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
lol what?

being critical of one highly-controversial organization makes a person "anti-charity" ?
No, I was referencing that this is one of many threads the OP started on various charities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 08:14 AM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,872,800 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
Komen has always had a pretty good reputation for their percentage payout to research and etc. - the problem was that they cut their "payout" to Planned Parenthood. They didn't have permission to do that - PP has the absolute RIGHT to determine who the Komen Foundation gives their grants to.

Planned Parenthood and their Abortion machine had a RIGHT to that money - so Komen had to be 'taught a lesson'. Hopefully, a lesson that other Charity Organizations would remember and take to heart. Thou Must not Offend PP and their supporters. PP is to be congratulated for their success.
When the Koman Foundation tried to cut Planned Parenthood out of their funding, it was the people who had been supporters of the Foundation who dropped Koman because they disagreed with that decision. People have a RIGHT to support organizations that mirror their own beliefs, and withhold support from those who don't, don't they?

It's laughable that you try to lay the massive hemorrhaging of support for the Foundation on everyone but where it belongs, on the Koman Foundation itself for its shortsightedness and for not having a clue what its own supporters believed in. The Foundation did indeed get "taught a lesson," one that they saw and understood when they reversed their decision. Unfortunately for them, their brand had already been tainted. They have no one to blame but themselves for letting their political agenda take precedence over their supposed mission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 08:16 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
No, I was referencing that this is one of many threads the OP started on various charities.
so how many charities can one criticize without being labeled "anti charity" ? is there some magic number?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,024,526 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
so how many charities can one criticize without being labeled "anti charity" ? is there some magic number?
Seriously. You're just trying to be argumentative now. By the way, you're using "anti charity" in quotes as though I said that except I did no such thing. Given the OP's multiple threads, it was a valid question to ask if he had a problem with charities as his complaints was not limited to one particular charity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top