Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
And lets not forget about the people who are turing legal age to work, those that are graduating high school/college....
12,000 turn 18 each day which is 2K more per day then those turning 65.

So 300K turn 65 each month but 360K turn 18 each month.

You have more entering the work force then leaving yet your participation rate is going down each month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: The Lone Star State
8,030 posts, read 9,050,957 times
Reputation: 5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
the America-haters
Again?
I call projection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,077 posts, read 51,218,516 times
Reputation: 28322
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Liberals no longer own the results of the economy. Obama has been begging for more stimulus for years and congress will not act. The blame is shared equally between Obama and Congress.
We don't need stimulus, particularly in the form of relief to people at the bottom of the ladder. The economy will get better without it and the improvement will be real instead of induced by temporary spending increases. On the other hand, we sorely need infrastructure improvements and spending in that area is an investment that will yield economic returns in future years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
We don't need stimulus, particularly in the form of relief to people at the bottom of the ladder. The economy will get better without it and the improvement will be real instead of induced by temporary spending increases. On the other hand, we sorely need infrastructure improvements and spending in that area is an investment that will yield economic returns in future years.
What is happening is that fast food and retail is driving this recovery.
Those salaries will never create an economic boom or drive any true recovery.
And that means we'll never really "recover" to what we had.

Those retiring boomers are not retiring from FF/retail jobs.
I am a retired boomer. Software engineer. My job went to India when I retired.
No American took my place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,801 posts, read 41,003,240 times
Reputation: 62194
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Surely this is good news to the Obama Swooners isn't it? Oh wait, unemployment ROSE to 7.3% with 720,000 Americans leaving the labor force. This exodus pushed the labor force participation rate down to 62.8%, the lowest level since 1978. One out of three adults in neither working nor actively looking for work.

Keep up the good work Obama.

October nonfarm payrolls up 204,000 vs. 120,000 estimate; unemployment rate at 7.3% vs. 7.3% estimate
Also waiting for the full time to part time stats based on Obamacare as in how many workers had their hours decreased so their employers didn't have to give them the kind of policies Obamacare demands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Florida
1,748 posts, read 2,083,266 times
Reputation: 1779
I love how it's being blamed solely on the baby boomers leaving the work force. The population of the country has been expanding exponentially since the baby boomer generation. Just having the baby boomers retire should not decrease the work force so drastically. There should be almost as many, if not more, new workers for every boomer that leaves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Also waiting for the full time to part time stats based on Obamacare as in how many workers had their hours decreased so their employers didn't have to give them the kind of policies Obamacare demands.
BLS says part time workers were unchanged in October.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,197 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The report accounts for 100K out of 720K dropping out.
I think the "boomers are retiring" is a bit hyped at this stage.

1957 was the peak of boomer births with 4.3 million born.

And with this economy and home values I doubt many are retiring early.
The stories are there of people NOT retiring and causing hardship for younger workers who can't get jobs.

You can't have it both ways.
While the statistics do show that the labor force participation rates for those between 55 and 65 have moved up slightly, those rates are still significantly below the rates of those younger than 55. The largest component of those not in the work force are retirees. The decline the LFPR was predicted decades ago. It is just not a good indicator of the strength or weakness of the employment situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,184 posts, read 19,457,116 times
Reputation: 5302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire600 View Post
You need to do some research before posting .
he villiage idiots regien of terror continues.

720k Americans Leave Labor Force in October

You do realize when someone retires they leave the Labor Force correct? And boomers are doing what now?? Retiring......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,197 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Sure, I agree. But I wouldn't say the entire 720,000 retired.
That's a false assumption.
Agreed, not all the 720,000 retired. However retirees likely make up the biggest slice of that number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top