Liberalism rears it ugly head once again - Dad is an "unfit" parent because he won't feed his son a Big Mac. (lawyers, accuse)

[surfman]

Originally Posted by weltschmerz

Well, sure. When a kid pitches a fit, the good parent gives in and lets the kid call the shots. It's called responsible parenting.

Corporal punishment cures such a propensity nearly every time. I'm thinking timeouts, and "everyone's a winner" parenting isn't the solution, but rather the cause of such behavior.

You know what they say about sparing the rod, or at least the threat of it.

Originally Posted by NoJiveMan

More asinine conservative nonsense.

Talk about a pot calling the kettle black. Wow!

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by MaseMan

Translation of the OP:

"Durrrr...me hate Obama...so-shul-ism...durrrrr!"

Wrong. Harrier hates no one , least of all the president.

Harrier certainly disagrees with his policies and did not vote for the man, but that does note equate to "hate".

It is funny that liberals who claim to be so tolerant, call political disagreement "hate'.

It demonstrates just how intolerant and hateful liberals really are.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by truthseeking

Can i get a large cola with that?!?!????

Not in liberal nanny state New York City.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by legalsea

You all should quick picking on Harrier. The New York Post told him to be outraged. Hence, he is outraged.

Wrong, Harrier was outraged about liberalism long before he discovered the New York Post.

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by greywar

Nothing remotely involving liberalism there, just the usual chaos and he said she said of divorce. Mixed in with judges trying to decide things, and shrinks writing reports.

We have NO idea whats actually involved in the stuff here....but nothing here in any way shape or form has anything to do with liberalism.

Sigh, this is just divorce foolishness.

I agree.

From the link:

"She recently filed motions asking the judge to punish her husband for flouting court orders and for a judgment on nonpayment of child support. Her attorney, Louis I. Newman, declined to comment on the McDonald’s matter. “It’s a litigation between Mr. Schorr and Mrs. Schiller,” Newman said.

Must be a slow news day.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Osito

I'm confused. I thought "liberals" were the ones trying to regulate what everybody eats and when.

They are - and the liberals in this case were trying to force a father to feed his child food from McDonald's.

[northnut]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Not in liberal nanny state New York City.

Yeah, you can.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by northnut

Yeah, you can.

Only because real Americans stood up to the liberal bullies.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by Little-Acorn

I thought parents were unfit when they DID feed their kids Big Macs?

Maybe that was last week.....?

It's Harrier and the New York Post, so the logic is pretty simple:

Something bad happened.
Liberals are bad.

Hence the bad thing that happened is due to liberals.

Using heuristics over logic saves time, but it does come with the side effect of not being able to form a logically consistent worldview.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

Using heuristics over logic saves time, but it does come with the side effect of not being able to form a logically consistent worldview.

Harrier's worldview is quite logical, thank you very much.