Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
have you ever considered getting some facts before posting?
Just WHERE are the political leanings of ANYONE in this story identified?
Are you really incapable of understanding it's lawyers doing what they do. slinging mud? Are you alleging all lawyers are liberals?
It was a psychologist in NYC - what more do you need?
No, not all attorneys are liberals, and Harrier aspires to go to law school and take the California bar exam, adding another conservative voice to the legal universe.
have you ever considered getting some facts before posting?
Just WHERE are the political leanings of ANYONE in this story identified?
Are you really incapable of understanding it's lawyers doing what they do. slinging mud? Are you alleging all lawyers are liberals?
That's like asking The New York Post to get some facts before printing.
In all seriousness, this is a guy who allegedly hasn't paid child support and so he tries to garner sympathy with nonsense like this. And all of the personal responsibility mavens jump right on it.
Ridiculous.
Now a psychologist has tried to prevent a father from gaining custody of his child simply because he did what any responsible parent would do, feed his son good food and not junk from McDonald's.
Location: The Land Mass Between NOLA and Mobile, AL
1,796 posts, read 1,662,111 times
Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
More asinine liberal nonsense.
Now a psychologist has tried to prevent a father from gaining custody of his child simply because he did what any responsible parent would do, feed his son good food and not junk from McDonald's.
Um, I've read all the posts on this forum, and I'm not seeing how this is a liberal/conservative issue. Some people would say that liberals oppose feeding children fast/junk food, thus the father must be a liberal as opposed to his mother. Others might say that denying a child food is congruent with a conservative parenting style.
Given that this particular incident took place in Manhattan, a place that conservatives often accuse of so-called nanny-state liberalism because of bans on large sugary drinks and foods containing trans-fats, it boggles the mind to understand why a father who *refuses* to feed his son such food is somehow a victim of liberalism. I really don't get it, and you can't have it both ways. If the third-person-referencing Harrier would care to explain, then that would be welcome, although I don't think it's cool to refer to yourself in the third person. If Harrier wants to speak, let him do so in the first person like the rest of us mere mortals.
If the third-person-referencing Harrier would care to explain, then that would be welcome, although I don't think it's cool to refer to yourself in the third person. If Harrier wants to speak, let him do so in the first person like the rest of us mere mortals.
Harrier has dealt with this issue by making his custom title "illeistic".
It was done to solve the problem of people going off topic, like yourself, by discussing Harrier's posting manner.
Please take the custom title at face value and refrain from discussing irrelevancies.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
