Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by highcotton View Post
Do you have any original thoughts there, cotton? Anyway, that was last week's talking point, no? I believe the memo said this week we talk about "Obama said I could keep my doctor, but my doctor is not on the Obamacare plan."

 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:33 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,506,034 times
Reputation: 4622
Headline for an AP article on Huffington Post --- "Obamacare Website Update Gets Mixed Reviews"

Obamacare Website Update Gets Mixed Reviews

I guess 'mixed' is accurate, but sounds more bad than good to me.

At this stage of the process, 'mixed' or 'a work in progress' isn't good enough. "Despite the Obama administration's team of technicians working around the clock, it's not clear if the site will be able to handle the surge of applicants expected by the Dec. 23 deadline to enroll for coverage starting at the beginning of the year."
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Well, whatever the drivers health care costs are starting to fall in line. Here is a story fresh this morning on CNBC. While I doubt you will read it, it does have some encouraging signs that the runaway costs in this sector may be seeing sustainable control pressures.

The rollout of President Obama's health care law may have deeply disappointed its supporters, but on at least one front, the Affordable Care Act is beating expectations: its cost.

Over the next few years, the government is expected to spend billions of dollars less than originally projected on the law, analysts said, with both the Medicaid expansion and the subsidies for private insurance plans ending up less expensive than anticipated.


Already, the Congressional Budget Office has quietly erased hundreds of billions of dollars from its projections. It now estimates that Medicare spending in 2020 will be $137 billion lower than it thought in 2010, a drop of 15 percent; Medicaid spending will be $85 billion, or 16 percent, lower; and private health insurance premiums are expected to be about 9 percent lower.

Cost of Health Care Law Is Seen as Decreasing
Taking on millions of new medicaid subscribers and they will save money ?
The government cannot control costs..they can only control what they reimburse when it comes to medicare and medicaid.

Medicaid spent $432 billion in 2011.
It's quickly catching up to medicare spending.
The 10 year projection is $795 billion by 2021.
Enrollment growth projected to rise 4% annually for the next 10 years.
This is from the Office of the Actuary.
And they took expansion under Obamacare into projections.

The CBO is given a set of numbers and is asked.."Does this work?"
If the CBO says no then they are presented with a new set of numbers.

How many times was Obamacare numbers giving to the CBO until the CBO came back and said yes ?

I'll take what the Office of the Actuary says over what the CBO says any day of the week.

http://medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Pr...eport-2012.pdf

And from your own link..the economy is doing this:
But those are responsible for only a tiny portion of the slowing rise of health care costs; other changes, like rising deductibles and copays that discourage some people from seeking extra services, play a bigger role, analysts say. Still, the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research group, estimates that the weak economy accounts for as much as three-quarters of the slowdown in the growth of spending on health care.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:45 AM
 
7,928 posts, read 9,152,376 times
Reputation: 9344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
This is disgusting. Health insurers who profit from extortion of the sick and injured are protected from loss while millions who are going to be digging deeper into their pockets to pay their premiums get no relief. How about we hold harmless the working people for once instead of pandering to the wealthy. If Obama (or anyone in DC) really wanted to do something to promote affordable health care, he would let the insurers go bankrupt and then step in with a tax-funded, universal system that excluded them completely.
What did you expect from a law that was written by lobbyists from the insurance companies? Obama and the Democrats got paid off, face it. Republicans also failed by not proposing something more substantial than the usual sell across state lines and tort reform ideas.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
This is disgusting. Health insurers who profit from extortion of the sick and injured are protected from loss while millions who are going to be digging deeper into their pockets to pay their premiums get no relief. How about we hold harmless the working people for once instead of pandering to the wealthy. If Obama (or anyone in DC) really wanted to do something to promote affordable health care, he would let the insurers go bankrupt and then step in with a tax-funded, universal system that excluded them completely.
Boy were you hoodwinked. They HIRED the insurance industry to write the damn bill.

Liz Fowler for one.
Baucus praised her for putting together the framework that turned into Obamacare.
Do you think the insurance industry would write themselves out of business ?
They are winners no matter what.
And the WH made the direct deal with big Pharma.

Obama was courted by them going back as far as 2006.

Next time..follow the money instead of listening to politicians talk.
Get the real scoop on who comes out the winner.

Baucus Thanks Wellpoint VP Liz Fowler for Writing Health Care Bill | FDL Action

Here's the 2006 article on the growth of the "Obama machine".
He referred to himself as a "Progressive" back then.
http://archive.is/T4Ga
Progressive candidates generally have a harder time raising money, he said, and at times some of them will “trim their sails” on behalf of the people who are financing them
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Boy were you hoodwinked. They HIRED the insurance industry to write the damn bill.

Liz Fowler for one.
Baucus praised her for putting together the framework that turned into Obamacare.
Do you think the insurance industry would write themselves out of business ?
They are winners no matter what.
And the WH made the direct deal with big Pharma.

Obama was courted by them going back as far as 2006.

Next time..follow the money instead of listening to politicians talk.
Get the real scoop on who comes out the winner.

Baucus Thanks Wellpoint VP Liz Fowler for Writing Health Care Bill | FDL Action

Here's the 2006 article on the growth of the "Obama machine"
Barack Obama Inc.: The birth of a Washington machine
I know who wrote the bill, but thanks for letting me know you read my previous posts where I talked about that.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:59 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,408,266 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
This is disgusting. Health insurers who profit from extortion of the sick and injured are protected from loss while millions who are going to be digging deeper into their pockets to pay their premiums get no relief. How about we hold harmless the working people for once instead of pandering to the wealthy. If Obama (or anyone in DC) really wanted to do something to promote affordable health care, he would let the insurers go bankrupt and then step in with a tax-funded, universal system that excluded them completely.
That's the spirit, Mr. Ponderosa! Thank you for pulling the curtain back on President Obama.

I think we can agree on this: health care reform needs massive reform.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 10:03 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,506,034 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSHL10 View Post
What did you expect from a law that was written by lobbyists from the insurance companies? Obama and the Democrats got paid off, face it. Republicans also failed by not proposing something more substantial than the usual sell across state lines and tort reform ideas.
Not that it matters, but the R's also proposed tax deductions, HSA incentives, $ for state-run high risk pools, easier coverage portability, and other measures. All rejected out-of-hand by the D's.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
Not that it matters, but the R's also proposed tax deductions, HSA incentives, $ for state-run high risk pools, easier coverage portability, and other measures. All rejected out-of-hand by the D's.
All of which are nothing but indirect handouts to insurers. The major failing of Obamacare is the capitulation on a public option. A public option could have undercut insurers and opened the path to eliminating profit, greed, and extortion from the equation for good. Of course, and that is why it never saw the light of day.
 
Old 12-03-2013, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
All of which are nothing but indirect handouts to insurers. The major failing of Obamacare is the capitulation on a public option. A public option could have undercut insurers and opened the path to eliminating profit, greed, and extortion from the equation for good. Of course, and that is why it never saw the light of day.
HSA is direct spending and tax deferred.

The Dems passed the bill with ZERO Republican votes.
If they wanted a public option there would have been one.

Remember we have a FIRE economy.
F got theirs and RE got theirs.
Now it's I's turn.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top