Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2013, 12:35 AM
 
15,531 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812

Advertisements

Look at the vote, it's overwhelming. Laws, Acts, and Legislation Apparently it's what the people of Ohio wanted. For whatever reason, they felt it was needed. States can govern themselves, it's none of my business.

 
Old 11-25-2013, 05:55 AM
 
Location: TX
6,486 posts, read 6,388,858 times
Reputation: 2628
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
Look at the vote, it's overwhelming. Laws, Acts, and Legislation Apparently it's what the people of Ohio wanted. For whatever reason, they felt it was needed. States can govern themselves, it's none of my business.
Except that you don't really know how the majority in your state would vote, and now there's a precedent. Would you truly have an "oh well" sort of attitude if your state (and every state you thought of moving to to escape this idiocy) decided to do this? What if the next majority voted to ban your particular religious views, or some other demographic you may be a minority in?

Some freedoms should not be vulnerable to majority rule (or what we're told is majority rule...)

Besides, most of the people who voted "Yes" probably thought that cops and judges can read and remember the important aspects of the law (when the rest of us know they cannot).

The law was to ban "designing, building, constructing, fabricating, modifying, or altering a vehicle to create or add a hidden compartment with the intent to facilitate the unlawful concealment or transportation of a controlled substance, prohibit operating, possessing, or using a vehicle with a hidden compartment with knowledge that the hidden compartment is used or intended to be used to facilitate the unlawful concealment or transportation of a controlled substance"

You see, we all know this means that prosecutors should have to prove there was intent to use these compartments for hiding drugs before they have any case (and before the defendant loses his ability to sue the officer who arrested him).

But cops and judges (and juries, don't wanna leave them out) are often illiterate and/or just plain evil. That's why this law is backfiring on the state of Ohio, because they took the law for how it reads and the powers that be take the law for how they can ignore essential bits and pieces.

Last edited by Vic 2.0; 11-25-2013 at 06:04 AM..
Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top