Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Anyone and that is both straight and gay, male or female, that practices unprotected anal sex, stands a greater risk of cotracting the HIV virus that leads to AIDS. Period, it is not a gay disease or a straight disease, though close to 70% of new cases worldwide are among straight people, it is a human disease. Anyone who fools themselves into thinking that their risk of getting it are nil because they are straight are straight fools.
NO way possible.....Unless you determine bi-sexual Africans as straight.....
Not necessarily. What if someone is born with HIV, or contracted it from a blood transfusion? Those people can still spread the disease, no?
My point is the person will have gotten HIV from elsewhere first.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980
Yes, and the same can be said for a gay couple... if they are virgins and/or test clean, then remain in a faithful and monogamous relationship, they are at no more risk than you & your wife. Thus my point, that being gay in and of itself is not the risk factor.
Good luck with that. If gay men are inserting their parts in certain places, I can't support 100% safety.
The other issue is the possible personality changes... that can be for another thread...
In fact it doesn't transmit easily through the Vagina... it's very acidic down there. It's the proper, natural place for the penis.
It is a majority gay, anal sex disease, with a minor in blood trans. and I.V. Drug users.
If you're so certain of your claims, how about we find you a nice, HIV-positive gay man for you to hook up with without a condom and try to 'convert' to heterosexuality.
If it isn't so much of a risk being passed through vaginal sex, what would you be afraid of, right?
Hey, maybe him turning straight will even cure the disease!
The mind of a conservative sheds a lot of light onto science.
They only insert their parts in the same places that you have done with your wife.
Guaranteed.
Projecting again?
What is it with liberals who hope and pray (well, scratch that last part, since God doesn't exist in their world) that others are as depraved as they are?
Did your world leading chemistry expert friend tell you how the disease can determine the difference between a male and a female anus? Heterosexuals have anal sex too. So, it is not a "guy-guy" thing, it is an anal sex thing.
From what I understand, it's more of a men have a much easier time transmitting the disease than women thing. Gay men can switch roles, which dramatically increases the risk, even if they have the same sexual behavior as straight people (well, assuming they have anal sex. If they don't, then the risk is really low.) Lesbians, on the other hand, are basically free from any worry whatsoever.
If the risk of contracting hiv were the same for straight people, we would see a lot of straight people wasting away and dropping like flies. After all, most straights don't use condoms during sex.
The thing about hiv that many people don't like to admit, because it's un-pc to do so, is that it's still largely a gay disease. Where do you find bunches of straight people infected with it? In the 3rd world. Why is it that we don't see that type of thing in a 1st world country like the USA???
You are so wrong, close to 70% of new cases worldwide are in straight people, not gay people. This lie does nothing to stop the spread of HIV, it helps it spread in straight people by keeping them ignorant. Rather foolish.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.