Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They do know that this is abuse in the welfare system.
they are not parallel to each other..welfare is not a Constitutional Right.
You weren't talking about what is and isn't a constitutional right, you were saying those who you believe don't know enough about guns shouldn't pass laws about them.
You weren't talking about what is and isn't a constitutional right, you were saying those who you believe don't know enough about guns shouldn't pass laws about them.
Yes I countless millions believe this..
And they do not know what they are talking about.
Do you want someone this stupid passing laws about anything, let alone basic Constitutional rights that say "Shall Not Be Infringed"?
Banning 3d-printed firearms will stagnate American industry? Christ. I had no idea our entire economic system was so reliant on a single previously-non-existant item.
With 3-D printed plastic guns, and their supposed "undetectability," having been much in the news of late, it might sound odd that a legislator would try to sneak a printed gun ban through Congress, but last Thursday, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attempted to do just that. On the very day that Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced S. 1774, to extend the so-called "Undetectable Firearms Act" for one year, Schumer asked that the bill be passed with "unanimous consent."
In other words, Schumer had hoped to pass the bill without any debate, and without any of the other procedural "speed bumps" intended to prevent legislation from being forced through before anyone has an opportunity to object. From the Congressional Record:
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that, as in legislative session, the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. 1774, a bill to reauthorize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 1 year, introduced earlier today; that the bill be read three times and passed and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table with no intervening action.
S. 1774, we are told, differs from H.R. 1474 and S. 1149 in that those two bills are even more restrictive (and even more transparently not motivated by the claimed fear of "undetectable" guns) than the current, soon-to-expire law, because they would also ban printed magazines, and printed gun receivers, while S. 1774 ostensibly "only" keeps in place the current ban of entire firearms made with less than the mandated minimum quantity of metal--although the text of the legislation is not yet available, so we are evidently expected to take Nelson's and Schumer's word on that score.
Goes to show you why we can have or do anything fun or exceptional because a bunch of statist regressive like Chuck Schumer.
If we can hold out until December 9 we will be in the clear.
Will have to check it out. This is really not about guns, but guns will be how they try to control it. The only other radical economic paradigm shift would be in energy and they already have much greater control there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr
I think the "panic" is over a radical economic paradigm shift. I think using gun production by the dangerous citizens is a good way for them to rationalize further control and slow it down. Those other applications are setup in a different way. They don't pose the same threat to corporate central control.
Food is another interesting area.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.