Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which 4 Presidents should be on the next Mt.Rushmore?
William Howard Taft (1909-1913) 3 2.94%
Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) 5 4.90%
Warren G. Harding (1921-1923) 3 2.94%
Calvin Coolidge (1923-1929) 5 4.90%
Herbert Hoover (1929-1933) 1 0.98%
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1945) 35 34.31%
Harry S. Truman (1945-1953) 12 11.76%
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961) 28 27.45%
John F. Kennedy (1961-1963) 37 36.27%
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969) 3 2.94%
Richard Nixon (1969-1974) 3 2.94%
Gerald Ford (1974-1977) 1 0.98%
Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) 2 1.96%
Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) 35 34.31%
George H.W. Bush (1989-1993) 2 1.96%
Bill Clinton (1993-2001) 10 9.80%
George W. Bush (2001-2009) 5 4.90%
Barack Obama (2009-) 11 10.78%
None, leave it as it is 45 44.12%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,635 posts, read 16,011,321 times
Reputation: 5285

Advertisements

Only president that came after Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,635 posts, read 16,011,321 times
Reputation: 5285
Roosevelt and Eisenhower, not sure about the other 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:36 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,303 posts, read 60,450,550 times
Reputation: 60891
I find absolutely hilarious the current Eisenhower nostalgia. Until Obama was elected he was generally considered among the bottom tier of Presidents, occasionally being considered just above mediocre.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:39 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,083 posts, read 38,832,717 times
Reputation: 17006
Hoover, Nixon, Clinton, Obama

We could call it the wall of shame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,635 posts, read 16,011,321 times
Reputation: 5285
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
I find absolutely hilarious the current Eisenhower nostalgia. Until Obama was elected he was generally considered among the bottom tier of Presidents, occasionally being considered just above mediocre.
From all the 18 Republican Presidents Eisenhower has always been considered the 3rd best, after Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt but anyway I just wanted to have a equal mix of Republicans and Democrats on the mountain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:54 AM
 
3,404 posts, read 3,447,195 times
Reputation: 1684
Reagan and jfk are no brainers. I then went roosevelt and eisenhower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:57 AM
 
8,017 posts, read 5,848,744 times
Reputation: 9680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bydand View Post
Hoover, Nixon, Clinton, Obama

We could call it the wall of shame.

And to make it fitting, we could carve it out of t, and then celebrate when the first good rain washes it out of our collective sight.

Last edited by CaseyB; 12-07-2013 at 08:08 PM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 07:58 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,303 posts, read 60,450,550 times
Reputation: 60891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
From all the 18 Republican Presidents Eisenhower has always been considered the 3rd best, after Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt but anyway I just wanted to have a equal mix of Republicans and Democrats on the mountain.

And that's just revisionist bull****. He was absolutely vilified (not to Nixon's levels) throughout the decades from 1960 to 2000. Something about not doing enough for Civil Rights, being too old, encouraging false beliefs about the US (Leave It To Beaver), presiding over 8 years of stagnation after the Democratic victories for society in the Great Depression.

As I said, current Eisenhower worship is revisionist bull**** by Democrats deflecting from the absolute uselessness of the incumbent President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,798,769 times
Reputation: 40166
None. Mount Rushmore should be left as it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
I find absolutely hilarious the current Eisenhower nostalgia. Until Obama was elected he was generally considered among the bottom tier of Presidents, occasionally being considered just above mediocre.
Wrong. Completely wrong.

In every major survey since 1982 of Presidents by historians, President Eisenhower has ranked no lower than #12. In all 11 such surveys going back to 1994, he has ranked between #8 and #10 in all but one (where he placed #6, and that survey came in 2008, before Senator Obama was elected President).
Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

President Eisenhower left office with a public approval rating of 60%. If you think that dived after he left office, only to surge again in the last half decade, feel free to actually provide some evidence of that. Good luck - it simply appears that you do not know what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 08:10 AM
 
8,017 posts, read 5,848,744 times
Reputation: 9680
It's still early, but it's refreshing to see that nobody has voted for Nixon or Obama, the two presidents who put the "lie" in "outlier".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top