Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So should they drag up old stories instead of focusing on what's going on now to make you happy?
I havent suggested they not cover the story, I suggest they not be so hypocritical about demanding Christy know about a bridge closure while making excuses for others about thigns far more serious which affects all americans...
You may need to find a reason to justify the hypocracy, but I for one find it funny.. almost as funny as MSNBC whining non stop because a bridge closed.
I havent suggested they not cover the story, I suggest they not be so hypocritical about demanding Christy know about a bridge closure while making excuses for others about thigns far more serious which affects all americans...
You may need to find a reason to justify the hypocracy, but I for one find it funny.. almost as funny as MSNBC whining non stop because a bridge closed.
I actually don't give a **** what they show, I just don't watch what I don't want to. They play to the audience, like how Fox ignored Christie and focused on Gates book for the second or third day. The nature of 24 hour news today is that they talk about the same thing over and over and over.
I actually don't give a **** what they show, I just don't watch what I don't want to. They play to the audience, like how Fox ignored Christie and focused on Gates book for the second or third day. The nature of 24 hour news today is that they talk about the same thing over and over and over.
then why are you upset because I'm laughing at MSNBC's hypocracy?
Well, obviously they did do it as revenge. Even if everything Christie said in his news conference is true he still hired and had a culture that permitted this to happen with these very close advisors. He may survive politically but there is still much damage done. Still, he's probably one of the best hopes the Republicans have nationally.
At least when he found out, heads rolled.
The way Obama has handled his encounters, you would think he personally put them up to it.
then why are you upset because I'm laughing at MSNBC's hypocracy?
Because its a silly thing to complain about. I'm certainly not "upset", just pointing out that you probably wouldn't mind if Fox focused on something small and meaningless if it was about Obama.
The way Obama has handled his encounters, you would think he personally put them up to it.
Does firing somebody really make a difference? Does firing somebody in charge of the website or the guy with the bridge really matter after those things occurred? Seems more like pandering.
Does firing somebody really make a difference? Does firing somebody in charge of the website or the guy with the bridge really matter after those things occurred? Seems more like pandering.
Because its a silly thing to complain about. I'm certainly not "upset", just pointing out that you probably wouldn't mind if Fox focused on something small and meaningless if it was about Obama.
I wonder if its sillier to complain that MSNBC is hypocritical, or whine because someone created a thread laughing because MSNBC is hypocritical
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
