Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:39 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
What is better is that our nation's unemployment rate has dropped from 10% in Oct 2009 to 7% today!

You only want to focus on what is still bad about the economy.

Whereas, I continue to point out what has improved since 2008.
If more people are out of work, then what does the rate really matter? Thats asinine.

Lets see if I can summarize your thought process...

People dont need to really have jobs in your mind to indicate things are better, people just need to give up hope that they will ever find a job, so they just stop looking for work all together..

yep, asinine is the word that comes to mind.

gees, I bet you think things were fabulous during the great depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:47 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,687,395 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
But we're talking about 500K MORE people losing their jobs in the last quarter, not people who cant find jobs that were lost 1/2 a decade ago.
Wait until the Obama amnesty when 11 to 30 million people are added to the legal labor pools -- they can give up their lettuce picking jobs to grab up all those new Best Buy and Circuit City jobs, as well as any other legal job they might want to take. And Obama has promised them that after amnesty, they can start bringing in their relatives who want also to work here.

Do you really think Obama would be doing a very massive amnesty of cheap foreign workers if he really thought there was a shortage of jobs or that unemployed Americans actually wanted to work?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:54 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,983,727 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
But we're talking about 500K MORE people losing their jobs in the last quarter, not people who cant find jobs that were lost 1/2 a decade ago.
A look back in History for July vs Sept in 'LNU02000000 '(Unadj) Employment Level

Year July----- Sept-- (Difference = July minus Sept)
2003 138,503 137,731 772
2004 140,700 139,641 1059
2005 143,283 142,579 704
2006 145,606 145,010 596
2007 147,315 146,448 867
2008 146,867 145,310 1557
2009 141,055 139,079 1976
2010 140,134 139,715 419
2011 140,384 140,502 -118
2012 143,126 143,333 -207
2013 145,113 144,651 462

Take note at how many years we lost jobs during the past 10 years between July and Sept?

The info is available in a spreadsheet here: Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Mircea ... are you paying attention here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mircea
'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level

145,113,000 July 2013
144,651,000 September 2013
------------
-462,000 Americans lost their job.

Last edited by RD5050; 12-29-2013 at 11:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 11:00 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
A look back in History for July vs Sept in 'LNU02000000 '(Unadj) Employment Level

Year July----- Sept-- TOTAL
2003 138,503 137,731 772
2004 140,700 139,641 1059
2005 143,283 142,579 704
2006 145,606 145,010 596
2007 147,315 146,448 867
2008 146,867 145,310 1557
2009 141,055 139,079 1976
2010 140,134 139,715 419
2011 140,384 140,502 -118
2012 143,126 143,333 -207
2013 145,113 144,651 462

Take note at how many years we lost jobs during the past 10 years between July and Sept?

The info is available in a spreadsheet here: Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Mircea ... are you paying attention here?
We arent talking about 2003, or 2004, or 2005, or 2006 etc.. we're talking about the third quarter.

Are YOU paying attention?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 11:05 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,983,727 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
We arent talking about 2003, or 2004, or 2005, or 2006 etc.. we're talking about the third quarter.

Are YOU paying attention?
I am showing you that we regularly lose jobs between July to September ... this is nothing new in 2013.

And when does this third quarter end?

You guessed it .... September !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Perhaps you should take a look back at all the millions of jobs lost as a direct result of the Bush Economic Disaster of 2008 ....

Job losses caused by the Great Recession - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You keep talking about Labor Participation Rate being the lowest in 30 years?

Please tell me when else during the past 30 years did we ever loose 7 MILLION JOBS in matter of ONE YEAR?
Never.

The data that you have presented is false.

The following data is truthful and accurate, unlike the false data you posted...

'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level

2000 136,891,000

2001 136,933,000 42,000 workers added (from previous year)

2002 136,485,000 -448,000 job losses

2003 137,736,000 1,251,000 workers added

2004 139,252,000 1,516,000 workers added

2005 141,730,000 2,478,000 workers added

2006 144,427,000 2,697,000 workers added

2007 146,047,000 1,620,000 workers added

2008 145,362,000 -685,000 job losses

2009 139,877,000 -5,485,000 job losses

2010 139,064,000 -813,000 job losses

2011 139,869,000 805,000 workers added

2012 142,469,000 2,600,000 workers added

2013
143,884,000 1,415,000 workers added through November 2013

Intelligent people with common sense do not use Pukipedia, since it is not an authoritative source on anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Apparently I DO as shown in my quote which you pasted! As singer Paul Simon once said ... "A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest"
That would be you....

'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level

145,113,000 July 2013
144,775,000 November 2013
------------
-338,000 Americans lost their job.

'LNU02500000
'(Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Full Time

117,688,000 July 2013
116,875,000
November 2013
------------
-813,000 Americans lost their Full-Time job.


813,000 Americans losing their Full-Time job over the last 5 months is a sign of an improving economy?

Which part of "813,000 Americans have lost their Full-Time job in the last 5 months" do you not understand?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Regarding stocks .... 52% of Americans have money in the stock market.

That's a heck of lot of Americans who watched their retirement portfolios climb to new highs this week!

I'm confused....

Are you saying that Income Inequality is a good thing?

Or, are you saying that Income Inequality does not apply to Liberal Elites?

Or, are you saying that Income Inequality does not apply to people who have retirement portfolios?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
The nation's unemployment rate continues to drop .... month after month.

The economy IS getting better!
Which part of "813,000 Americans have lost their Full-Time job in the last 5 months" do you not understand?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You didn't address what I posted. You just put in a smiley face. That doesn't mean things are getting better it just means you have a smiley face in your post.
Of course he didn't address it....he's not interested in Reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-third-quarter-growth-raised-to-41-2013-12-20

"Yet the news wasn’t entirely positive. While Americans spent more on recreational pursuits, the bulk of the increase in consumer outlays was directed toward health care and gasoline — necessities that deprive households of discretionary income to spend on other goods and services."
Yes, I know.

Why do you think over the last several years I have repeatedly characterized Obamacare as a massive misguided misdirection of Capital.....namely Cash....into a vast black-hole-sink-hole-money-pit?

It is not possible to direct that much money into nothingness without negative economic consequences.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Zimbabwe and reality disagrees with you
You shouldn't use Zimbabwe. That's a really poor example for any number of reasons.

The Zimbabwean monetary system is a closed system. No one uses Zimbabwean Dollars except for Zimbabweans; the Zimbabwean Dollar is not traded internationally; not accepted by the BIS; has limited potential; is unstable in a State that is politically and economically unstable, plus lacking jurisprudence.

That makes the Coefficient of Absorption for the Zimbabwean Dollar exactly "0".

At "0" any excess currency introduced will cause Real Inflation, and not only that, but it will be damn near instantaneous.

With a Coefficient of 0.000129 or something at least it would take a few weeks or months before it showed up in the economy.

Looking back....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 11:48 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,983,727 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Never.

The data that you have presented is false.

The following data is truthful and accurate, unlike the false data you posted...

'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level

2000 136,891,000

2001 136,933,000 42,000 workers added (from previous year)

2002 136,485,000 -448,000 job losses

2003 137,736,000 1,251,000 workers added

2004 139,252,000 1,516,000 workers added

2005 141,730,000 2,478,000 workers added

2006 144,427,000 2,697,000 workers added

2007 146,047,000 1,620,000 workers added

2008 145,362,000 -685,000 job losses

2009 139,877,000 -5,485,000 job losses

2010 139,064,000 -813,000 job losses

2011 139,869,000 805,000 workers added

2012 142,469,000 2,600,000 workers added

2013
143,884,000 1,415,000 workers added through November 2013

Intelligent people with common sense do not use Pukipedia, since it is not an authoritative source on anything.

Looking back....

Mircea
The data I presented for the past TEN YEARS came from the exact same place you got it ... The BLS.

Have a look at the link I provided: Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And I have shown using a spreadsheet, that the -462,000 jobs lost number you show for July 2013 vs Sept 2013 is nothing new.

And I am specifically referring to the numbers for July - Sept ... not the full year ... as you changed to above. So instead of admitting to being wrong ... you change the subject?

We have been losing jobs between July - September nearly every year for the past TEN YEARS! The numbers below in RED are jobs lost (in thousands).

Notice how my numbers for July and Sept 2013 are the same as yours?

Year --July---Sept --Difference (July minus Sept)
2003 138,503 137,731 772
2004 140,700 139,641 1,059
2005 143,283 142,579 704
2006 145,606 145,010 596
2007 147,315 146,448 867
2008 146,867 145,310 1,557
2009 141,055 139,079 1,976
2010 140,134 139,715 419
2011 140,384 140,502 -118 (jobs gained)
2012 143,126 143,333 -207 (jobs gained)
2013 145,113 144,651 462

All above numbers are in thousands (000)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post

'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level

145,113,000 July 2013
144,651,000 September 2013
------------
-462,000 Americans lost their job.
Think BEFORE you post!

Last edited by RD5050; 12-29-2013 at 12:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 12:03 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,462,301 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Wait until the Obama amnesty when 11 to 30 million people are added to the legal labor pools -- they can give up their lettuce picking jobs to grab up all those new Best Buy and Circuit City jobs, as well as any other legal job they might want to take. And Obama has promised them that after amnesty, they can start bringing in their relatives who want also to work here.

Do you really think Obama would be doing a very massive amnesty of cheap foreign workers if he really thought there was a shortage of jobs or that unemployed Americans actually wanted to work?
Of course he would. The Democrats want votes. Why do you think the Democrat intense interest in immigration reform coincides with the shift of hispanic votes to the Democrat party? You think that's just a coincidence? Harry Reid, the man who is leading the immigration reform charge in the Senate, is also the man who introduced anti-immigration legislation back in the 90s. Let that sink in.

Barrack Obama received 17% more of the hispanic vote than Bill Clinton got. And suddenly immigration reform bringing in a path to citizenship for millions more hispanic voters becomes a top priority for the Democrat party.

Do you really think Obama cares if a poor white American's job, who generally vote Republican, goes to a poor hispanic, who generally vote Democrat? If Obama cared more about the health of the American worker than he did about politics then he never would have said what he did in the 2008 primary debate. He was told that raising the capital gains tax rate was showed to have caused less revenue to come in due to the laffner curve. His answer was that he'd raise it anyway for purposes of fairness. So according to Obama in his own words, if it means he can make political speeches about how fair he is, he is willing to lower the government's revenues and to have companies park their profits overseas instead of here in the American economy. Is that someone who cares about American workers?

People who support Obama because he "cares about the common people" are utter idiots. Obama cares about Obama. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 12:57 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,983,727 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Never.

The data that you have presented is false.

The following data is truthful and accurate, unlike the false data you posted...

'LNU02000000
'(Unadj) Employment Level
<snip>
2011 139,869,000 805,000 workers added

2012 142,469,000 2,600,000 workers added

2013
143,884,000 1,415,000 workers added through November 2013

Mircea
And since you brought up this topic ... I should also add your above 143,884,000 number for November 2013 is WRONG as well.

Have a look: Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

November 2013 is 144,775,000 which would mean 2,306,000 workers were added this year through November 2013!

Truthful and accurate .... indeed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 01:03 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
I am showing you that we regularly lose jobs between July to September ... this is nothing new in 2013.

And when does this third quarter end?

You guessed it .... September !!!
And you moaned and groaned about those job losses consistantly, which now has me wondering why the hell they are good..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top