Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well for conservatives, the earth is flat too, no?
For many it's round, but only about 6000 years old. And of course for some, the Rapture will be happening soon (....any day now!) So why would they worry about the future of the planet? Or anyone else other than themselves?
More lies. 2013 was actually the sixth warmest on record. Sure, it's nice that we didn't hit yet another record warm but the long term trends are all still in effect even if the deniers want to pretend other wise.
Among those in the global warming cult, "warming" causes cooling, white is black, and up is down. It is like a child proclaiming "opposite day". However, this is more alarming, as members of the global warming cult are (mostly) adults and should not embrace the whimsical aspects of "opposite day" when attempting to implement law and policy that can be detrimental to the rest of us who do not suffer from their affliction.
If only the libs wanted to pay increased energy costs, lose their jobs, depress economic activity, and embrace toxic energy sources, that would be okay. However, their idiocy is being imposed upon the rest of us through the tyranny of misguided EPA regulations and legislation. In short, we are being asked to pay for their idiocy, even though we know better.
It's supposed to be 65 degrees tomorrow here where I live in PA. Which is about as relevant to the global warming argument as your post. Which is to say; it isn't.
I'll take that 65 degrees, year round please. Currently 64 degree but raining. Here in thriving Black walnut Pa
I believe in proven science. Much of the climate change science is less than proven. I believe man impacts the climate and our environment. I also believe that is you crap where you eat, eventually you will get sick. We need to clean up our act, but in a reasonable manner. It would help also if the messengers like Al Gore were not liars. It would help if the messengers actually practiced what they preach.
Actually, NOAA is a government entity, that has a vested interest in seeing the size and scope of government increased, not a scientific organization.
Come on, don't you know, "Day After Tomorrow", is all based on science, and that Hollywood movies are credible sources of scientific evidence and research... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_After_Tomorrow
Last edited by jasper12; 12-22-2013 at 09:42 AM..
Reason: Added link
Yea, any scientific organization with a connection to the government must not practice real science.
Certainly not credible science considering their only solution is the expansion of the size and scope of that same government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny
And we all know that the U.S. government is anti capitalist and wants to promote a message that expands restrictions on business.
That is certainly true among the different entities of government. Government, by its very nature, is anti-capitalistic. For a truly capitalistic free-market to exist it must be completely absent of all government. However, as an avowed socialist I am certain you were not aware of that reality.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
