U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:33 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,894,671 times
Reputation: 2172

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Your answer to the arguement is simply way too low. Laffer and others has essentially demonstrated the most efficient point is higher. And my personal experience also disagrees with you.
What on earth? The Laffer curve is "how to raise the most money via taxation". I'm talking about the effect of taxes on decisions and motivation the two are NOT the same, however, the Laffer curve is a RESULT of what I'm talking about.




Quote:
At your age the only way you'd be in Medicare is with a disabiltiy.
Medicare takes OTHER PEOPLE's MONEY to pay for the patient's needs.


Quote:
My patients certainly get their money's worth. And the Medicare program has saved a great deal of money over the years investing in me as compared to other docs.
It doesn't "invest" in you or anyone else. It's an expense, paid for by the taxpayers.

Quote:
The money I and my businesses have put back in as Federal taxes have overwhelmingly cancelled out your contribution.
Not in the slightest.

You have never created a penny of wealth... the wealth used to pay for your services. It was all earned by people who create wealth, so it can be spent on your services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:36 AM
 
18,455 posts, read 8,129,807 times
Reputation: 4043
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
??? You think UMC kids and poor kids in this country have equivalent educational and intellectual upbringings???
Opportunity based simply due to social status, time or geography can of course be dramatic. Through no fault of his own Bill Gates had all three.


Change the time to 10 years earlier, and there would be no opportunity like his.

If he was born in AZ, same time, same family, there may have been no similar opportunity for him.

Remove the social status, say Gates was born to a poor couple, and he may never have had his opportunity. And being born to a poor couple, more likely inheriting leeching, lazy and no-count genes... <LOL>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,825,931 times
Reputation: 3497
The unavoidable reason is free trade and Republican policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:45 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,894,671 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
The unavoidable reason is free trade and Republican policies.
How does free trade do it?

Precisely what "Republican" policies?

And who, to you, is "the middle class"? Provide a description that applies across all the different local economies in our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:46 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,514,491 times
Reputation: 13881
Those of you low-information "conservatives" - whose most common thread is taking delight at the plight, the poverty, of the workers low on the economic totem pole - continue to be your own worst enemies.

If you could only understand that it is YOU who elected Barack Obama....twice. The radical left loves you like their mother....because you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:48 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,894,671 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
Those of you low-information "conservatives" - whose most common thread is taking delight at the plight, the poverty, of the workers low on the economic totem pole - continue to be your own worst enemies.
Like the honest lawyer, Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and honest politicians... Don't exist.

Quote:
If you could only understand that it is YOU who elected Barack Obama....twice. The radical left loves you like their mother....because you are.
Accusing a non-existent demographic of electing Obama twice.... Is not a sign of great intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:49 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,437,472 times
Reputation: 6391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
The unavoidable reason is free trade and Republican policies.
Why didn't Obama change the trade agreements and 'Republican policies' in the first two years of his presidency when he had total control of Congress?

Why didn't he raise taxes on the rich at that time? Why didn't he even MENTION raising taxes on the rich until the Republicans controlled House?

Oh yeah, Bots are too brainwashed to even let these questions arise in their addled brains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:49 AM
 
3,022 posts, read 7,825,516 times
Reputation: 3873
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Good grief, there are so many confused people talking about this, who really don't have any idea what they mean when they mouth the platitudes... .so, let's try something that makes sense.

For a moment, let's make an assumption that you can't be any more "broke" than to have nothing - and by nothing, I mean nothing of any significant economic value. You can have clothes, even a cheap PC or tablet, a tv, and appliances, family keepsakes, etc, and it has a real value that approaches nothing. You could not sell it all in a rush sale and buy a car, a house, or pay rent for an extended period of time, etc.

So, let's say that if that's all you have, you have an economic worth of zero. You cannot get be worth less than that. Debts are obligations, but those can be discharged or remain unpaid - so, you can't be worth any less than nothing.

So, being worth nothing is poverty. But you have a job. So, you work at that menial job, and pays you $9.00 per hour, that's $1440 for 160 hour month. The home you live in (house, apartment, condo, mobile home... doens't matter) costs you $600 per month and you and your spouse consume the rest to eat, have clothes and heat and lights and water.

How much are you worth, economically? Still nothing.

Imagine your landlord agrees to sell you, on payments, your home. You make 600 dollar payments for 7 years and the apartment is yours. Now, what are you worth? My guesstimation? About $30,000. Now that you no longer pay rent, you can take your 1200 / mo (after taxes) and use what's left of it elsewhere. So, you begin to put that $600/mo into an investment. After 15 years of investing that money carefully, you are now worth about $250,000. Enough to start some pretty profitable businesses, or just keep saving for your future.

In 23 years, did you become middle class, or are you still in poverty? While your income would be, by all political standards, "poverty", you are, in fact, worth quite a bit. You became, despite a low income, "middle class". By living frugally, by judicious decisions, and by discipline and careful choices.

So why are so few blue collar people not middle class? It isn't the pay scale.

It's the fact that their house... they now pay 30 years of interest to buy a home that's overpriced by 2 to 20 times what they should, they pay all 600 a month in property and sales taxes instead of saving it. In that case, the state is 18,000 dollars richer... BUT you are 230,000 dollars poorer.

Where has the middle class gone? It has been taxed away, by taxing ownership. It's precisely that simple. The difference between the poor and middle class is not income, it is ownership and investment in ownership. And the difference between 30, 40, 50, 60 years ago, and today, is taxation.

In the 50's, the average person paid 2% of his income in federal income taxes. Property taxes were a little more, but not much. Limited availability of cheap loans kept the price of real estate from skyrocketing in most places. Thus, ownership was within reach of most who wanted. And once ownership was achieved, taxation of ownership was small and easily affordable.

Across the street from me is a house for sale. It's been for sale for 1.5 years. I live in a blue collar neighborhood. The payments would only be $750 / mo to own it. Except for the taxes. The taxes push the cost of ownership to 1100/mo and it goes up every other year, by quite a bit.

Where has the middle class gone? It is being taxed out of existence. Instead of owning, the middle class rents from either the state or the bank, or wealthy person, enriching them, but impoverishing himself.

Question answered.

Now what is your solution? More debt? Easier loans? It's worked so well up to now, hasn't it?
I will say amen to this post.We as older retiree's are o'k.We want to move back to Ct and have purchased a home.One problem is when I die all my retirement is gone,leaving wife on SS.our daughter and husband have worked 15 years at grocery store and income is hardly enough to live on.They trapped themselves
and have no way out due to age and skills.
Exactly what above poster is saying,if we left home to them they could not afford it,Ct does not have meaningful exemptions for seniors.We have $72,000 in exemptions after 22 years in FL.They do not consider SS as income,CT does and can tax it.
As I have said in other posts when we lived in CT in 1950's and earned $1.00 and bought first house at $1.50 per hour,20 per cent down, life was much more balanced,crazy today.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 10:51 AM
 
41,111 posts, read 25,381,304 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
Those of you low-information "conservatives" - whose most common thread is taking delight at the plight, the poverty, of the workers low on the economic totem pole - continue to be your own worst enemies.

If you could only understand that it is YOU who elected Barack Obama....twice. The radical left loves you like their mother....because you are.
Actually no one takes delight in anyone living in poverty. We just don't want the government to drag us into poverty too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 11:03 AM
 
18,455 posts, read 8,129,807 times
Reputation: 4043
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
What on earth? The Laffer curve is "how to raise the most money via taxation". I'm talking about the effect of taxes on decisions and motivation the two are NOT the same, however, the Laffer curve is a RESULT of what I'm talking about.
If your 20% barrier was true the curve would be shifted to the left. I agree that taxes can reduce one's desire to gain further. But I disagree with your low level.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Medicare takes OTHER PEOPLE's MONEY to pay for the patient's needs.

It doesn't "invest" in you or anyone else. It's an expense, paid for by the taxpayers.
Medicare does take some of my taxes, also other people's taxes, along with the patients premiums copays and deuctibles. Those and along with some money creation pays all the bills. And if Medicare saves money through my efficient care, that is a bonus to the program and taxpayers. It is a better return on money for the program and taxpayer.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
You have never created a penny of wealth... the wealth used to pay for your services. It was all earned by people who create wealth, so it can be spent on your services.

Before I was a doc I was a research chemist. And the research group of which I was a part formed the basis for some chemotherapies as well as early research with NMR, eventually evolving into the MRI machine. Some great value and wealth created through these entities.

Through my provision of medical services the last 40 years I have improved the health, happiness and livlihoods of many thousands of people. And through their longer and more productive lives, my input has been amplified. I have also invested in, built and run medical clinics and offices that have provided for the employment of many people. Through other investment in medical concerns, equipment and property developed businesses that have yielded profits while providing necessary ancillary medical services and more local employment. And other such profits reinvested in all sorts of other more typical and conventional nvestments and entities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top