Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The right wouldn't know what a left winger was even if their life depended on it. A left-winger is whoever Fox tells them it is. If you want a real left-winger, then look at Elizabeth Warren. Obama is a centrist corporate hack.
And you've spent 5 years defending him, fighting tooth and nail at every turn to make sure his beautiful, messianic face isn't tarnished. So what are we supposed to think of you? A leftist or a defender of "centrist corporate hacks?"
As per "The Curly Effect", politicians seek to increase the number of their constituents. As the democrats are the party of the poor and unemployed, democratic party policy will seek to increase these ranks. So far, they have done an excellent job of increasing the number of poor, dependent citizens. Next up? 30 million new poor, dependent "citizens" with "immigration reform".
The democrat party (unlike the party from the 1930s-1950s) is a fast track to third world status for the nation.
Educated, confident, and affluent citizens have little use for the democrat party.
As per "The Curly Effect", politicians seek to increase the number of their constituents. As the democrats are the party of the poor and unemployed, democratic party policy will seek to increase these ranks. So far, they have done an excellent job of increasing the number of poor, dependent citizens. Next up? 30 million new poor, dependent "citizens" with "immigration reform".
The democrat party (unlike the party from the 1930s-1950s) is a fast track to third world status for the nation.
Educated, confident, and affluent citizens have little use for the democrat party.
??? If that's the case. Democrat policy is unsustainable. On the other hand, the republican policy of increasing the number of the rich AND the number of those dependent on the rich, IS sustainable, even symbiotic.
I've read a claim that there are 800,000 degreed poor people in this country - what is their party?
It is surprising that more than 800,000 working-age adults with post-secondary education are–in fact–poor.
(snip) In 2000 for example, 22% of poor working-age adults had obtained a post secondary degree.
??? If that's the case. Democrat policy is unsustainable. On the other hand, the republican policy of increasing the number of the rich AND the number of those dependent on the rich, IS sustainable, even symbiotic.
I've read a claim that there are 800,000 degreed poor people in this country - what is their party?
It is surprising that more than 800,000 working-age adults with post-secondary education are–in fact–poor.
(snip) In 2000 for example, 22% of poor working-age adults had obtained a post secondary degree.
Proof positive that Obama is not a communist, socialist, or progressive. All of Obama's policies, except his rhetoric on gay issues and abortion, scream right-wing to me, not left. There's more to leftism than gay marriage
actually if you look at leftist policies..they push towards two classes..the poor serfs scraping by on the scraps of welfare, and the rich liberal elite masters
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
