Federal Court Denies Motion To Dismiss Lawsuit Against Virginia's Marriage Equality Ban! (federal government, support)

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by TheDragonslayer

Yeah, sure. You have yet to ever ever come up with any reason that the family is being attacked, threatened or marriage redefined. Because you really have nothing, so you create these straw men. That is wonderful, your side is losing because it lacks any kind of rational thinking.

You and the gay army are attacking the family.

Your denial of this fact is absolutely meaningless.

[Lunar Delta]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Wrong - Harrier argues from a non-religious standpoint.

His position is based in basic human morality.

It is you who constantly mentions religion in a discussion of public policy.

Kindly refrain from doing so, please.

And just what are your views of "basic human morality" derived from? Because from what I've seen of your postings, your morality is fairly twisted.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Lunar Delta

And just what are your views of "basic human morality" derived from? Because from what I've seen of your postings, your morality is fairly twisted.

Most human beings know right from wrong.

Harrier does.

Do you not?

Do you think that murder or theft is OK?

If not, what is your source for saying that they are wrong?

[Lunar Delta]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Most human beings know right from wrong.

Harrier does.

Do you not?

Do you think that murder or theft is OK?

If not, what is your source for saying that they are wrong?

When did murder or theft come into this? This thread is about same-sex marriage.

Anyway, my reasons for saying something is wrong primarily stem from the Golden Rule, also known as the ethic of reciprocity.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Lunar Delta

When did murder or theft come into this? This thread is about same-sex marriage.

We are discussing basic human morality.

Do you deny that laws against murder and theft are not based upon basic human morality?

[Linda_d]

Originally Posted by lowrimol

I am not endorsing the post that you responded to. However, you have to look at the left/right paradigm. MSM portrays the left caring more about social issues while supporting more government economic intervention, with the right calling for more economic liberty and less social liberty. Based on that, one can plausibly assume that someone who supports gay marriage is a Democrat or Liberal.

It is very possible to run into someone who supports gay marriage and is not a Democrat. But it's rare. I've only ran into a handful of people who fit that description outside of the Liberty movement.

You need to expand your circle of acquaintances. Since 18 states have legalized same sex marriage, most of them through the legislative process, there have to be more than a "handful" of Republican state lawmakers who support same sex marriage. Moreover, since somewhere around half of all Americans polled support same sex marriage, I would think that a few Pubbies would be in that mix as well.

[Cinebar]

Originally Posted by Lunar Delta

This thread is about same-sex marriage.

And for someone who whines about homosexuality being "shoved down his throat" (interesting choice of words, by the way) and who says things like:

Homosexuals are everywhere.

They want to be "mainstream".

How can Harrier avoid them?

....that poster sure spends an awful lot of time in these threads.

In fact, this morning, out of thirteen or fourteen posts in this thread, that poster had posted all but one of them.

I find his obsession with what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home to be.......well, weird and unnatural.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Linda_d

You need to expand your circle of acquaintances. Since 18 states have legalized same sex marriage, most of them through the legislative process, there have to be more than a "handful" of Republican state lawmakers who support same sex marriage. Moreover, since somewhere around half of all Americans polled support same sex marriage, I would think that a few Pubbies would be in that mix as well.

The District of Columbia is not a state.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Cinebar

I find his obsession with what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home to be.......well, weird and unnatural.

Harrier has no issue with what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home.

He does have an issue with homosexuals claiming that they can be married.

[TheDragonslayer]

Originally Posted by Harrier

You and the gay army are attacking the family.

Your denial of this fact is absolutely meaningless.

It is not a fact. There is no gay army, that is something someone who is paranoid and dillusional has made up and how is the family being attacked? man, you just fail over and over.