Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, but CravingMountains did, and you responded to Harrier's questioning of the use of that term.
What is the question?
Is it based on more of your assumptions?
Go to the previous page. The question is right there.
But just in case you missed it: if the government told you to, would you be celibate for the rest of your life? That's exactly what you think Turing should have done; his downfall was his own fault, for "choosing" to be gay. That is what you believe.
Ridiculous claim isn't it? Nobody is more proud of and exults and praises Turning's accomplishments more than the gay community. That's the exact opposite of marginalizing.
Go to the previous page. The question is right there.
But just in case you missed it: if the government told you to, would you be celibate for the rest of your life? That's exactly what you think Turing should have done; his downfall was his own fault, for "choosing" to be gay. That is what you believe.
No, Harrier wouldn't.
The crown was wrong to tell Turing to do so.
When you stop making assumptions about what you think Harrier believes, we can have a more productive discussion.
Ridiculous claim isn't it? Nobody is more proud of and exults and praises Turning's accomplishments more than the gay community. That's the exact opposite of marginalizing.
Except that you value him being gay more than you do his accomplishments.
That is twisted.
Let the man be a human being for goodness sake, not your mascot.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.