Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2013, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,041,295 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Did he say we need no laws at all? No laws prohibiting murder? I seriously doubt it.
He made a generalized statement saying we need no laws, if he meant we need some laws, then he should have said so. If someone says we need no laws, how am I to know which laws they think we need and don't need?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,921,684 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by db108108 View Post
You have so much rage this Christmas holiday. Go spend time with your family.
So do the fascists on the NYC city council.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,041,295 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
So do the fascists on the NYC city council.
So you are the same as the fascists of the NYC city council? That is basically what you are saying with this post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,921,684 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
So you are the same as the fascists of the NYC city council? That is basically what you are saying with this post.
No, and if you believe that, then you really have some issues to work upon, especially given the fact that you said the other night that you believe that Plessy v Ferguson and Dred Scott v Sanford were decided correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:42 AM
 
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,620 posts, read 12,694,202 times
Reputation: 20050
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
NYC. Most fascist city in the nation? It really is a shame what is happening there. I'm not sure how the people who live there can stand it.

should be a mass exodus out of there soon..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,041,295 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
No, and if you believe that, then you really have some issues to work upon, especially given the fact that you said the other night that you believe that Plessy v Ferguson and Dred Scott v Sanford were decided correctly.
And by that definition, you must believe that Brown v Board of Education was incorrectly decided because it was done by the judicial system that you seem to be very much against.

Harrier thinks the NYC City Council are fascist=Rage=Harrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,041,295 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruxan View Post
should be a mass exodus out of there soon..
I doubt it, the population in NYC and the NYC metro just keeps going up every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,921,684 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And by that definition, you must believe that Brown v Board of Education was incorrectly decided because it was done by the judicial system that you seem to be very much against.
No.

Brown v Board of Education was decided correctly.

Harrier isn't against the judicial system, only against wrongly decided cases.

He thinks that Plessy v Ferguson and Dred Scott v Sanford were wrongly decided, while you say that they were correctly decided simply because a judge or judges made the call.

Chief Justice Taney and the majority was and were wrong in Dred Scott v Sanford.

Justice Billings Brown and the majority was and were wrong in Plessy v Ferguson.

Chief Justice Warren(a Republican) and the rest of SCOTUS were right in Brown v Board of Education.

Justices Shelby and Vaughn were wrong in the Utah and California marriage cases, respectively, and Vaughn was biased - he is openly gay.

Judges are fallible.

You should be able to understand this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,041,295 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
No.

Brown v Board of Education was decided correctly.

Harrier isn't against the judicial system, only against wrongly decided cases.

He thinks that Plessy v Ferguson and Dred Scott v Sanford were wrongly decided, while you say that they were correctly decided simply because a judge or judges made the call.

Chief Justice Taney and the majority was and were wrong in Dred Scott v Sanford.

Justice Billings Brown and the majority was and were wrong in Plessy v Ferguson.

Chief Justice Warren(a Republican) and the rest of SCOTUS were right in Brown v Board of Education.

Justices Shelby and Vaughn were wrong in the Utah and California marriage cases, respectively, and Vaughn was biased - he is openly gay.

Judges are fallible.

You should be able to understand this.
I didn't realize Harrier was the Supreme Supreme Justice. Though by your logic, if you think one Supreme Court case is wrong, then you must think all of them are wrong, that is what you keep accusing me for because I feel a specific Supreme Court case is right, that must be that I think all of them are right....unless you are finally willing to admit your mistake, I can only continue to think this is correctly how you think in regards to the Supreme Court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,921,684 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I didn't realize Harrier was the Supreme Supreme Justice. Though by your logic, if you think one Supreme Court case is wrong, then you must think all of them are wrong, that is what you keep accusing me for because I feel a specific Supreme Court case is right, that must be that I think all of them are right....unless you are finally willing to admit your mistake, I can only continue to think this is correctly how you think in regards to the Supreme Court.
You did say that Plessy v. Ferguson and Dred Scott v Sanford were decided correctly because they were decided by an appointed and confirmed body of justices.

You claimed that the judicial tyranny imposed by the justices who have allowed gay marriage is also valid for similar reasons.

That reminds Harrier, you still haven't stated whether you think that Bowers v. Hardwick was decided correctly just because a body of justices said so.

If you need a reminder, that one upheld a Texas anti-sodomy law.

Harrier thinks that it was wrongly decided.

So is the NYC City Council wrong in their e-cigarette stance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top