Big Pharma Gives Another Child Narcolepsy via the Swine Flu Vax, Then Cures It with a Miracle Drug That Costs Over $20k (history, thought)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a surgeon, my brother has seen kids die from vaccinations. google it www.mayoclinic.com
I didn't get any information from your link, so I did a Google search and found nothing about flu vaccine deaths on any reputable website. Surgeons don't generally give vaccines and don't usually have much experience with them.
I've read of several cases here in Texas where they had the shot but got sick and ended up in the hospital.
The vaccine is only 60% effective against getting the flu.
Just because you get the shot is no guarantee you won't get the flu.
It's just your chances are better at not getting it…60% chance of not getting it.
Well, I ought to not respond at all, as you are questioning my truthfulness. But I will say, the pneumonia one gets as a secondary infection after a case of flu can be bacterial was well as viral. The flu virus does not cause pneumonia. It weakens the immune system and leaves it vulnerable to infection from other microbes. When the flu (influenza) leads to Pneumonia
From your link:
"Streptococcus pneumoniae or pneumococcal pneumonia is the most common cause of bacterial pneumonia acquired outside of hospitals. The bacteria can multiply and cause serious damage to healthy individual lungs, bloodstream (bacteremia), brain (meningitis) and other parts of the body, especially when the body's defenses are weakened. It is estimated that 175,000 cases of pneumococcal pneumonia occur each year, with a fatality rate of 5-7%, or even much higher among the elderly.5"
I know that.
Your quote still doesn't do anything to prove or disprove the point made.
As I said before, we could go back and forth and back and forth and end up in the same place.
I'm moving on.
Is it safe? How safe? Is it effective? How effective? What are my risks for developing the cancer? What are my risks from dying from the cancer? Are there any other preventative measures I could take to decrease my chances of getting said cancer?
I've read of several cases here in Texas where they had the shot but got sick and ended up in the hospital.
The vaccine is only 60% effective against getting the flu.
Just because you get the shot is no guarantee you won't get the flu.
It's just your chances are better at not getting it…60% chance of not getting it.
The bold is the case EVERY year.
The vaccine effectiveness varies from year to year, and from person to person. It's less effective in the elderly, but still effective in preventing death. Where'd you get your 60% number? I haven't seen any numbers for this year yet. All I've seen is that most of the deaths and even hospitalizations have been in the unimmunized.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452
Safe and effective, thoroughly tested.
And no matter how safe, effective, and thorougly tested, the anti-vax people will say it's unsafe, ineffective and untested!
And no matter how unsafe, un-effective and untested, the vax pushers will say it's safe, effective and tested!
None of them come out the gate unsafe, INeffective and untested. Some have not worked as well in large populations as the testing seemed to indicate, e.g. Lyme Disease vax (which was an unusual formulation).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.